Hello Holger, On Aug 15, 2007, at 01:30, Holger Frauenrath wrote:
> after a number of people here on this list helped me to get started > with BibDesk a couple of months ago, I have been using it ever since, > and I am more than happy with it. As I think it is possible that > software developers more often hear complaints from users about the > things that don't work, let me take the occasion again to say thank > you. The way Bibdesk works and feels like is really how bibliography > management should be! Thanks, that's nice to hear! It's also a good way to preface a feature request :). > There is one thing that would make my life much easier though, and > this is import of SciFinder searches. This looks like it would be really easy to parse. Christiaan, post if you start working on it; otherwise I'll take a look at it later today. No point in duplicating effort. Holger, if you can find a specification of types and field descriptions (e.g. does Accession Number map to anything in BibTeX?), that would be helpful. Also, are there any fields that can generally be ignored? In fact, adding to this file https://bibdesk.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/bibdesk/trunk/bibdesk/TypeInfo.plist would be most helpful, following the general pattern for BibTeXFieldNamesForWebOfScienceTags and BibTeXTypesForWebOfScienceTypes (for example). Post back if you have questions about the format (it's UTF-8 text). -- Adam ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
