Hi Christian, > Thanks. I chose JT because its description seemed closer to bibtex's > Journal field, that is, it's description suggests it includes /only/ > the full title name (rather than the weird values you quote). If TA > generally contains the more appropriate value, it's better to use > that. Do most entries have a TA field when it's needed? >
People using PubMed are likely needing the abreaviated, 'weird' :-) journal names in the TA field. As I said, this is the "Chemical Abstracts" style or a variation of, which is required by most journals. But keeping the full names from the JT field is indeed useful. > As for the date, I've moved the PY field to the bibtex Date field, and > parsed it for the Year and Month, if available. So the full value of > the PY field is retained. > That's great. Thank you very much! Miguel -- Architecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques UMR6098 ( CNRS, U. de Provence, U. de la Méditerranée ) Case 932 163 Avenue de Luminy 13288 Marseille cedex 9 France Tel : +33(0) 491 82 55 93 Fax: +33(0) 491 26 67 20 e-mail: miguel.ortiz-lombar...@afmb.univ-mrs.fr Web: http://www.pangea.org/mol/spip.php?rubrique2 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It is the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
