It’s not that simple. The UI has to change, it is not just displaying some 
custom value. I am not convinced this is worth the significant trouble. 

BTW, in your case I would recommend to use a file name for your custom header 
image that ends with “Template”. In that case the image is dynamically colored, 
e.g. for dark mode.

Christiaan

> On 24 Mar 2022, at 16:02, Alexander,J <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Christiaan,
> 
> The reason I asked is that I thought it could be possible via the same 
> mechanism BibDesk uses to display the paperclip icon in the “Local File” 
> column.  Since the bdsk-file-* fields are simply alphanumeric encodings of an 
> alias, I’m guessing that BibDesk checks to see if one or more bdsk-file-* 
> fields are present and, if so, then displays the paperclip icon at the 
> appropriate place in the row, rather than the literal contents of the 
> bdsk-file-* field.
> 
> Since an “Annote” or “Abstract” field is going to have far too many 
> characters to display any useful information, it would be nice to find some 
> kind of alternative indicator to note that the field is present.
> 
> Right now, I can certainly fake that by beginning every “Annote” or 
> “Abstract” entry with “*” or “•” or “X”, so that the only thing displayed is 
> that character, but since BibDesk already has icon-indicating capability for 
> the “Local File” column, it might be nice if that could be extended.  Perhaps 
> the rule could simply be: if a column as a custom-icon, add an option (set 
> using “defaults write -app BibDesk” so that the user-interface doesn’t need 
> to be cluttered with an option most users would not need) so that if the 
> contents of that field are non-empty, the custom-icon is displayed rather 
> than the field contents at the appropriate place in the row.
> 
> Many thanks for the reply,
> 
> Jason
> 
> 
>> On 24 Mar 2022, at 14:46, Christiaan Hofman <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 24 Mar 2022, at 12:38, Alexander,J <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> I would like to configure BibDesk so that entries which have an Annote 
>>> entry have a little notepad icon appearing in the table — similar to how 
>>> the paperclip icon appears if an entry has an attached file and the “Local 
>>> File” column shown. 
>>> 
>>> I have followed the instructions from the helpfile, and have set things up 
>>> so that the icon is now appearing in the header (a screenshot is shown 
>>> here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/g3mvs37yeoug8ui/bibdesk-header.png?dl=0 
>>> <https://www.dropbox.com/s/g3mvs37yeoug8ui/bibdesk-header.png?dl=0>).  
>>> However, the *text* of the Annote field is shown, and really I would like 
>>> the notepad icon to be shown.
>>> 
>>> Is this possible? If so, could someone please advise on how to do it?
>>> 
>>> Many thanks,
>>> 
>>> Jason  
>> 
>> No, that is not possible. And there would not be any way to make that 
>> possible. The way the content of a field is displayed in the table cells is 
>> determined by the type of fields, as set in the Fields preferences. And the 
>> app then determines how that is displayed. It would not be possible to tell 
>> the app to do something different, I could not even think how that could 
>> possibly be done.
>> 
>> Christiaan
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users

Reply via email to