Dear Mitchell,

I am not familiar with 
Thuy Pham-Remmele.  But a simple answer to your hypothetical would be a survey of bicycle riders in the "already friendliest bicycle city in America--Madison."  That would result in a percentage of the population riding--even most modestly like you describe.  As for people able to control their riding--tell that to the Ripon Surgeon MD who died on a road near Ripon after his assistant said he had been complaining all week of "chest pains."-----And he was a doctor.  So, as for people keeping their biking in relation to their fitness----?  I don't advocate putting barriers in the way to riding, I am questioning the numbers of riders;--most totally unfit know their situation and don't even wish to "coast along to work"--as you suggest, Mitchell.  Bike riders are an elite.

EW
Mitchell Nussbaum wrote:
What does "truly fit to ride bicycles" mean?  If you're racing to the top
of L'Alpe d'Huez, you need a finely-tuned aerobically-efficient body, as
well as an expensive bike.  If you're biking to work or class or the
grocery store, the standards are much lower.

I would suggest that the vast majority of Americans are sufficiently fit
to use their bikes for daily transportation, if they choose to do so.  And
if they do ride their bikes at a reasonable speed, with a reasonable level
of effort, they're less likely to need those ambulances than if they drive
everywhere.

The infrastructure that bike advocates seek is not for the "bicycling
elite" -- they can generally take care of themselves on ordinary streets
and roads -- but for the ordinary bikers, who are unwilling to go
head-to-head with motor traffic.

It's unfortunate that Eric, who does apparently ride a bike pretty
regularly, is spouting the same line as Thuy Pham-Remmele, who seems to
have an unconditional hatred of bicycling in all its forms, but I've come
to expect that sort of thing.

Eric Westhagen wrote:
  
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">Dear Matt,<br>
<br>
What percentage of Americans are truly fit to ride bicycles
regularly?&nbsp;
Won't that be likely to drop even lower as the average American weight
rises even more.&nbsp; And above the weight, who are fit cardiovascularly
to
get off on a road with a few hills and miles from home?&nbsp; It is one
thing to exercise where one can stop if over stressed.&nbsp; Sure many on
this list are probably on bikes and say they are neither pictures of
fitness or have the teenage weight they once had.&nbsp; But you had better
increase the ambulance squads if going out biking is pressed on the
general public.&nbsp; Matt, you are simply pressing for more
infrastructure
for the bicycle elite once again.&nbsp; But you are correct probably in
assuming that motorists might associate with motorists and, in fact
might be jealous of fit bicyclists whizzing along and wish they could
be of that small group.<br>
EW<br>
</font><br>
Matt Logan wrote:
<blockquote cite="" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:mid:[email protected]">"mid:[email protected]"
 type="cite">
  <pre wrap="">As someone who moved to Madison and more or less stuck to
the rules
(except for a couple years of critical mass), the largest benefit will
be to the safety of bicyclists.  Beyond that, I am highly skeptical.

I have come to realize that the public perception of bicyclists is
largely driven by the simple fact that drivers will excuse the behavior
of other drivers, but will criticize identical behavior from bicyclists.
The real solution to the perception problem is not better bicyclists,
but better bicycling infrastructure that attracts more drivers onto
bicycles more frequently.  When more drivers are bicyclists too, they
tend to see things from a different perspective.

_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:[email protected]">"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org">"http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org">http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org</a>


  </pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

    

_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org


  
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

Reply via email to