Your point about reaction time is well taken but I disagree with your 
comparisons.  I would say riding at 20 vs a walker at 3 is nothing like a 70mph 
car and a 10mph cyclist.  One is painful the other is dead.   The differences 
don't end there.  At 70 your braking time is MUCH longer.  Your brain also has 
a lot of other things to visually process because you are passing many more 
objects.  And the closing rate for 70 v 20 is 88 feet/second, for 20 v 3 it's 
25 feet/second.    

In your other example, the closing rate for 35 v 10 is 37 feet/second, for 10 
v. 3 it's 10 feet/second, closing almost 4 times faster not the same.  But 
closing rates and other numbers are hard to wrap your head around, so I like 
your idea of comparing.  

I don't see an issue with bikes going 20 on the path if it's done safely, so 
I'll make this comparison: biking at 20 mph closing on a ped at 3 is the same 
closing rate as driving at 27 mph closing on a bike going 10.  Certainly worth 
being careful, but not so dangerous we need to outlaw it.  

All that said, there is some safe limit, but I don't know what it is or how to 
establish it.  Maybe I'll know after I get hit. 

Reminds me of a quip from Seinfeld: "Ever notice everyone driving faster than 
you is a maniac, and everyone driving slower than you is an idiot?" - Seinfeld

-Doug
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Darryl Jordan 
  To: Scott Ellington ; [email protected] 
  Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 10:37 AM
  Subject: Re: [Bikies] NYTimes: An Electric Boost for Bicyclists


        A point worth considering regarding speed is closing rate speed and 
braking rate while on the bike path. Whether or not it is fully human-powered 
or assisted, the closing rate of a bicycle traveling at 10 mph approaching from 
the rear on a pedestrian traveling at at 3 mph is the same rate as an 
automobile at 35 mph approaching a cyclist at 10 mph. It's a timing issue of 
when to brake, pass, or react irrationally. A cyclist traveling at 20 mph is 
going nearly seven times the speed of a pedestrian. It's kind of like an 
automobile going 70 mph coming up on a 10 mph cyclist. Irrespective of the 
effects of less mass moving at slower speeds, a collision is still painful if 
one can't adjust in time. 


        The other issue is visibility. Even at "moderate" speeds if a path user 
can't see an imminent collision approaching to react in time there's going to 
be trouble. I ride a recumbent and the bridges on John Nolan obstruct forward 
visibility so I have to slow down
        in anticipation of seeing someone approaching. I almost got rear-ended 
by someone on a mountain bike because he was too impatient to cross the bridge 
behind me. Of course it my fault that he was tailgating.  


        My two cents
        Darryl  

        --- On Tue, 2/2/10, Scott Ellington <[email protected]> wrote:


          From: Scott Ellington <[email protected]>
          Subject: Re: [Bikies] NYTimes: An Electric Boost for Bicyclists
          To: "bikies" <[email protected]>
          Date: Tuesday, February 2, 2010, 10:10 AM


          The article didn't really make it clear that some of them are 
actually electric mopeds.   I think they are legal here, licensed like mopeds, 
for street operation only.  The "Electric Assisted Bicycles" are very 
different, in that the operator generally HAS to pedal, and top speed is about 
20 mph.  There are some federal regulations designating them as "Low Speed 
Electric Bicycles".  I believe one of the requirements is that the power assist 
has to cut out above 20 mph.  I don't believe they are covered by any state 
legislation in Wisconsin, so they now exist now exist in a state legal limbo.

          While I believe that the 30 mph electric mopeds should certainly be 
banned from bike paths, I don't have a problem with their use on streets.  
They're quieter and less polluting than gasoline mopeds, and may get a few cars 
off the roads.  I wouldn't have a problem sharing bike paths with electric 
assisted bicycles long as their maximum assisted speed is reasonable.  I think 
20 mph is too high;  15 mph would be more reasonable, as that's much closer to 
the speed of most cyclists.  The last thing we need on shared paths is more 
high-speed bikes, in addition to the inconsiderate racer-types we already have. 
 However, even with a lower top speed, they might get some cars off the roads 
and increase support for bike routes.

          Scott



          Scott Ellington
          Madison, Wisconsin
          USA



          _______________________________________________
          Bikies mailing list
          [email protected]
          http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
       



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Bikies mailing list
  [email protected]
  http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

Reply via email to