For vehicles approaching the Capital City Trail and Eastwood Avenue from Division Street, there are multiple signals- one at the near side of the intersection and one at the far side of the intersection. There is only a "no turn on red" sign posted at the near signal. Cars that have come to a stop or rolled toward the intersection without registering the sign will then look to the far signal and assume incorrectly that it is ok to turn right on red.
See the Google Street View for clarification of the intersection signals. < https://www.google.com/maps/preview#!q=eastwood+drive+at+division+street&data=!1m8!1m3!1d3!2d-89.351141!3d43.092462!2m2!1f90!2f90!4f75!2m4!1e1!2m2!1syUJotfcgr-fM3qxQD-cvOg!2e0!4m10!1m9!4m8!1m3!1d2337!2d-89.3515326!3d43.0927907!3m2!1i1265!2i616!4f13.1&fid=5 > -india WeAreAllMechanics.com [email protected] Stay connected- Follow WAAM on Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/We.Are.All.Mechanics> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:47 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > I don't ride through this intersection enough to comment on > > specifically, but I do find "No right on red" intersections in general > > to be problematic. The problem is that it's easy for a driver to space > > out the "No" part of the sign; > > Shouldn't the sign be on the same post as the light such that they are > right next to each other, where it can't be missed? > _______________________________________________ > Bikies mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org > >
_______________________________________________ Bikies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
