On 6/15/2011 8:28 AM, M. Meadows wrote: > Question : why does eftc as an address record in the thehartford.com > zone file have a 30 second TTL? Seems … very … short. I think most > nameservers won’t do less than a minute for an address record. Right?
No. There is no problem with a short TTL. > Question : our check of whois indicates that ns1.thehartford.com and > ns2.thehartford.com are the authoritative nameservers for > thehartford.com. A dig with a +trace for eftc.thehartford.com seems to > indicate that they are indeed the auth nameservers. It’s interesting, > though, that an http://www.kloth.net/services/nslookup.php lookup for > thehartford.com > <http://www.kloth.net/services/nslookup.php%20lookup%20for%20thehartford.com>query > for NS records shows a non-authoritative answer of > hfdns3.thehartford.com, hfdns4.thehartford.com, simns3.thehartford.com, > simns3.thehartford.com and simns4.thehartford.com. We’re unsure what’s > going on with that. The zone is broken in that the NS records in at the gTLD don't match the NS records in the zone itself. See: http://bit.ly/jmi2Cd AlanC
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
