On 18.03.2015 13:02, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >>> On 18.03.15 11:48, Constantin Stefanov wrote: >>>> then both views will refernce ther same writable file, won't they? Or am >>>> I missing something about "in-view" directive? > >> On 18.03.2015 11:56, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >>> maybe you could put all those zone definitions into one file and include it >>> in each view. > > On 18.03.15 12:05, Constantin Stefanov wrote: >> I can't. It stopped working after upgrade to 9.10, but worked before >> with 9.6. And the question is how to keep the config as simple as it was >> before upgrade. > > I mean, the "in-view" definitions... So now I have to have two definitions for every slave zone in different files. Well, it is the thing I did, but I do not like it.
Requirement to have 2 synced definitions in 2 different places leads to bugs. > >>> the only other way is stop using views... > -- Konstantin Stefanov, Research Computing Center M.V Lomonosov Moscow State University _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users