On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 02:52:34PM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote: > all sorts of annoyance -- if I'm running low on space for cache, and > spend much time twiddling the "max-acache-size" knob before > discovering that someone has simply snipped the wires to it, I'd be > super-grumpy.
But hopefully in this scenario you're paying attention to log messages, and would have seen the "obsolete option" warning. The question is, should your nameserver complain and keep running, or should it reufse to run? And for "max-acache-size", enh, I'd probably be okay with it. But a standard policy that covers all deprecated options would need to be stricter than "enh". -- Evan Hunt -- e...@isc.org Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
