Correct.

On Fri, 28 Jun 2024, 12:54 Renzo Marengo, <buckroger2...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ok very veri interesting,and about this doubt?
>
> etc/resolv.conf in bind server is used only from client services ? E.g.
> ping tool
> I think bind9 dns service doesn't contact any /etc/resolv.conf, right?
>
> Thanks again
>
> Il giorno ven 28 giu 2024 alle ore 13:10 Greg Choules <
> gregchoules+bindus...@googlemail.com> ha scritto:
>
>> Hi again Renzo.
>>
>> In general, BIND (and other resolvers) make non-recursives (aka
>> iterative) queries to authoritative servers, such as the roots and others.
>>
>> - Clients (laptops etc.) make recursive queries to the DCs. If the DCs
>> know the answer they respond immediately; no forwarding needed.
>> - If the DCs don't (currently) know the answer, they make recursive
>> queries to BIND because that's what you have told them to do, using either
>> global or conditional forwarding. If BIND knows the answer it responds
>> immediately; no need to make queries into the Internet.
>> - If BIND doesn't (currently) know the answer it makes non-recursive
>> queries to anywhere it needs, to gather information to construct a response.
>> It is important to note that each of these is a separate DNS conversation.
>>
>> Does that help?
>>
>> Please get another server (and a test server) and upgrade them all to
>> current software.
>>
>> Cheers, Greg
>>
>> On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 at 11:58, Renzo Marengo <buckroger2...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Greg again! :)
>>>
>>> > 1) This should help you understand the difference between recursive
>>> and non-recursive queries.
>>> I read about recursive and iterative query but I think A.B.C.D server
>>> should be as recursive server for domain controllers, I ask myself the same
>>> question to root servers? Or Bind9 server should have to make iterative
>>> queries to root servers ?
>>>
>>> > I hope this server is behind a good firewall?
>>> Yes
>>>
>>> >Do you only have one BIND server?
>>> >I would recommend two at least, in case you need to take one down for
>>> maintenance or it fails for some reason.
>>> Yes only one server
>>>
>>> >> Your "allow-..." statements should look like this, with IP addresses,
>>> not domain names.
>>> Oh yes, this one was to explain you what servers I inserted into this
>>> list.
>>>
>>>
>>> I have another doubt, /etc/resolv.conf in bind server is used only from
>>> client services ? E.g. ping tool
>>> I think bind9 dns service doesn't contact any /etc/resolv.conf, right?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Il giorno ven 28 giu 2024 alle ore 08:46 Greg Choules <
>>> gregchoules+bindus...@googlemail.com> ha scritto:
>>>
>>>> Hi Renzo.
>>>> You're welcome.
>>>> 1) Correct. You don't need forwarding for a simple resolver. Take a
>>>> look at the meaning of the RD flag in the BIND protocol header. This should
>>>> help you understand the difference between recursive and non-recursive
>>>> queries.
>>>> 2) No. See 1)
>>>> 3) Yes. For a standard resolver facing the Internet you do not need a
>>>> hint zone.
>>>>
>>>> Some more thoughts occurred to me:
>>>> - I hope this server is behind a good firewall?
>>>> - Do you only have one BIND server? I would recommend two at least, in
>>>> case you need to take one down for maintenance or it fails for some reason.
>>>> - Your "allow-..." statements should look like this, with IP addresses,
>>>> not domain names.
>>>>    allow-... {127.0.0.1; <query_source_IP_address_of_DC1>;
>>>> <query_source_IP_address_of_DC2>; <any_other_source_addresses...>;}; You do
>>>> not need to include this server in the list.
>>>>
>>>> Any changes you make should be done on a test server first, so you can
>>>> be comfortable understanding what effect those changes have and only move
>>>> them to production when you are certain.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers, Greg
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 at 07:14, Renzo Marengo <buckroger2...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi greg,
>>>>> I thank you again for your suggestions.
>>>>>
>>>>> >A.B.C.D is the address of this server?
>>>>> yes, It's the Bind server
>>>>>
>>>>> I read several documents about DNS architecture
>>>>> My questions is about this configuration of bind:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1- according to your opinion my bind makes queries ro root server if
>>>>> is set no 'forwarders' option? I'll verify It by tcpdump as you suggested
>>>>> 2- Do you suggest to set some "forwarders" ?
>>>>> 3-- This bind version has root server built-in? If I removed 'named.ca'
>>>>> reference, Bind would use root server built-in?
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Il giorno ven 28 giu 2024 alle ore 07:51 Greg Choules <
>>>>> gregchoules+bindus...@googlemail.com> ha scritto:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Renzo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for that. The hints look OK. A bit old, but they will work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The first thing I would advise you to do as a matter of priority is
>>>>>> to upgrade BIND.
>>>>>> 9.11 has been end-of-life for a few years and there have been many
>>>>>> security fixes since then. 9.18.27 is the current version.
>>>>>> You could install that directly, or upgrade RHEL and obtain a more
>>>>>> recent packaged version.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can check what BIND is doing by using "tcpdump". For example:
>>>>>> sudo tcpdump -n -i <interface> -c 1000 port 53 and host A.B.C.D
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am making some assumptions:
>>>>>> A.B.C.D is the address of this server?
>>>>>> <interface> is the name of the interface the server will use for
>>>>>> outbound queries, according to its routeing table. I am guessing this is
>>>>>> the interface with address A.B.C.D?
>>>>>> -c stops the capture after 1000 packets. This is just a safety
>>>>>> precaution.
>>>>>> port 53 and host A.B.C.D limits the capture to only packets with port
>>>>>> 53 (DNS) AND with the address of this interface, so you don't capture any
>>>>>> SSH or HTTPS etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A fresh (recently restarted) DNS resolver - any one, not just BIND -
>>>>>> will make queries to the root to start with. It does this to learn where 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> go next. It stores the results of those queries in its cache so that it
>>>>>> doesn't have to make them again for some time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are many good books and articles available online to explain
>>>>>> the basics of DNS. The BIND ARM (distributed with BIND and also available
>>>>>> online) is the reference manual for BIND itself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I hope that helps.
>>>>>> Greg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 at 05:57, Renzo Marengo <buckroger2...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Greg,
>>>>>>> he info you required:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1) BIND 9.11.4-P2-RedHat-9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.2 (Extended Support
>>>>>>> Version) on running on Linux x86_64 3.10.0-1160.2.2.el7.x86_64
>>>>>>> 2) named.ca if file which contains root servers
>>>>>>> named.ca
>>>>>>> ----
>>>>>>> .                       518400  IN      NS      a.root-servers.net.
>>>>>>> .                       518400  IN      NS      b.root-servers.net.
>>>>>>> .                       518400  IN      NS      c.root-servers.net.
>>>>>>> .                       518400  IN      NS      d.root-servers.net.
>>>>>>> .                       518400  IN      NS      e.root-servers.net.
>>>>>>> .                       518400  IN      NS      f.root-servers.net.
>>>>>>> .                       518400  IN      NS      g.root-servers.net.
>>>>>>> .                       518400  IN      NS      h.root-servers.net.
>>>>>>> .                       518400  IN      NS      i.root-servers.net.
>>>>>>> .                       518400  IN      NS      j.root-servers.net.
>>>>>>> .                       518400  IN      NS      k.root-servers.net.
>>>>>>> .                       518400  IN      NS      l.root-servers.net.
>>>>>>> .                       518400  IN      NS      m.root-servers.net.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
>>>>>>> a.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      A       198.41.0.4
>>>>>>> b.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      A       199.9.14.201
>>>>>>> c.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      A       192.33.4.12
>>>>>>> d.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      A       199.7.91.13
>>>>>>> e.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      A       192.203.230.10
>>>>>>> f.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      A       192.5.5.241
>>>>>>> g.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      A       192.112.36.4
>>>>>>> h.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      A       198.97.190.53
>>>>>>> i.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      A       192.36.148.17
>>>>>>> j.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      A       192.58.128.30
>>>>>>> k.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      A       193.0.14.129
>>>>>>> l.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      A       199.7.83.42
>>>>>>> m.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      A       202.12.27.33
>>>>>>> a.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      AAAA    2001:503:ba3e::2:30
>>>>>>> b.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      AAAA    2001:500:200::b
>>>>>>> c.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      AAAA    2001:500:2::c
>>>>>>> d.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      AAAA    2001:500:2d::d
>>>>>>> e.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      AAAA    2001:500:a8::e
>>>>>>> f.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      AAAA    2001:500:2f::f
>>>>>>> g.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      AAAA    2001:500:12::d0d
>>>>>>> h.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      AAAA    2001:500:1::53
>>>>>>> i.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      AAAA    2001:7fe::53
>>>>>>> j.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      AAAA    2001:503:c27::2:30
>>>>>>> k.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      AAAA    2001:7fd::1
>>>>>>> l.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      AAAA    2001:500:9f::42
>>>>>>> m.root-servers.net.     518400  IN      AAAA    2001:dc3::35
>>>>>>> ----
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I didn't know some Bind versions had the Internet root hints
>>>>>>> built-in.
>>>>>>> About my configuration I understand that bind makes always queries
>>>>>>> to root servers ? Right?
>>>>>>> I'd like to re-check configuration of bind
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Il giorno gio 27 giu 2024 alle ore 22:15 Greg Choules <
>>>>>>> gregchoules+bindus...@googlemail.com> ha scritto:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Renzo.
>>>>>>>> Ah OK, I had it the wrong way round. AD DNS needs to resolve names
>>>>>>>> in the Internet on behalf of its clients, so it forwards to BIND.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In that case, two questions:
>>>>>>>> 1) What version of BIND are you running? You can get this with
>>>>>>>> "named -V"
>>>>>>>> 2) What is in the file "named.ca"?
>>>>>>>> For a long time (which is why I need to know the version) BIND has
>>>>>>>> had the Internet root hints built in, so you don't need a hint zone
>>>>>>>> anymore. Unless you are defining different roots for some reason. 
>>>>>>>> Hence why
>>>>>>>> I need to know the contents of that file.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks, Greg
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 at 18:06, Renzo Marengo <
>>>>>>>> buckroger2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Greg,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> thank you very much for your explanation.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Let’s supposte AD domain was ‘my domain.it’  and I have 6000
>>>>>>>>> computers of government institute.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here my bind configuration:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> named.conf
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ———
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> include “…. named.conf.options" ;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> zone "." IN {
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> type hint;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> file "named.ca";
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> include “…. named.rfc1912.zones";
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> include “….  named.root.key";
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ———
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> named.conf.options
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ———
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>         logging {
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                 channel named_debug {
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                 syslog local6;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                 severity debug 1;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                 print-category yes;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                 print-severity yes;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                 print-time yes;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                 };
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>         category default { named_debug; };
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>         };
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> options {
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> auth-nxdomain no;    # conform to RFC1035
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> allow-recursion {127.0.0.1; A.B.C.D; dc1.mydomain.it;
>>>>>>>>> dc2.mydomain.it; ….. } ;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> allow-query       {127.0.0.1; A.B.C.D; dc1.mydomain.it;
>>>>>>>>> dc2.mydomain.it; ….. } ;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> recursive-clients 3000;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> allow-query-cache {127.0.0.1; A.B.C.D; dc1.mydomain.it;
>>>>>>>>> dc2.mydomain.it; ….. } ; ;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> listen-on port 53 { 127.0.0.1; A.B.C.D; };
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> directory “….. named";
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> dump-file “….. cache_dump.db";
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> statistics-file “….. named_stats.txt";
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> memstatistics-file “…. named_mem_stats.txt";
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> recursing-file  “… named.recursing";
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> secroots-file   “… named.secroots";
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> recursion yes;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> dnssec-enable no;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> dnssec-validation no;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> bindkeys-file "….. named.iscdlv.key";
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> managed-keys-directory "….. dynamic";
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> pid-file "….. named.pid";
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> session-keyfile "….. session.key";
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ———
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >Thirdly, I would not forward to AD DNS, unless the AD servers
>>>>>>>>> also recurse and can provide >resolution for delegated names below 
>>>>>>>>> the AD
>>>>>>>>> domain
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >that are not hosted on the AD servers themselves.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There is no forward option to AD DNS. Forward is enable from AD
>>>>>>>>> DNS to A.B.C.D. bind9 server.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> All clients are using AD DNS infact every query, about name of ‘
>>>>>>>>> mydomain.it,’ is resolved from AD DNS.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> When client asks an external domain, e.g. www.google.it, AD
>>>>>>>>> server forward query to A.B.C.D. server. (Forward option is set on 
>>>>>>>>> every
>>>>>>>>> domain controller)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Only AD DNS  make queries to A.B.C.D server and it’s necessary
>>>>>>>>> only to solve external domains.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A.B.C.D. server never makes queries to AD server. A.B.C.D. is next
>>>>>>>>> dns server which partecipates when it’s necessary to resolve an 
>>>>>>>>> external
>>>>>>>>> domain
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I hope to have explained right.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I thought A.B.C.D server made query to root server because into
>>>>>>>>> configuration there is no reference to forward option, because I 
>>>>>>>>> thought to
>>>>>>>>> set as DNS forward a government dns of my country. What do you think?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have doubts about recursive and iterative queries options too.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Il giorno gio 27 giu 2024 alle ore 13:24 Greg Choules <
>>>>>>>>> gregchoules+bindus...@googlemail.com> ha scritto:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Renzo.
>>>>>>>>>> Firstly, please can we see your BIND configuration and have the
>>>>>>>>>> actual AD domain name.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Secondly, BIND, or any other recursive DNS server, does not
>>>>>>>>>> 'forward' to the root servers, unless you have configured it 
>>>>>>>>>> explicitly to
>>>>>>>>>> do so, which would be a bad idea and not work anyway. It will recurse
>>>>>>>>>> (paradoxically, perform non-recursive aka iterative queries) to the 
>>>>>>>>>> roots
>>>>>>>>>> and other authoritative servers. It is an important distinction to 
>>>>>>>>>> be aware
>>>>>>>>>> of.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thirdly, I would not forward to AD DNS, unless the AD servers
>>>>>>>>>> also recurse and can provide resolution for delegated names below 
>>>>>>>>>> the AD
>>>>>>>>>> domain that are not hosted on the AD servers themselves. Personally 
>>>>>>>>>> I would
>>>>>>>>>> use a stub or static-stub zone in BIND to refer to the AD domain.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In general, decide which DNS is going to do the resolving and
>>>>>>>>>> make that the control point, fetching data from wherever it needs to 
>>>>>>>>>> (e.g.
>>>>>>>>>> AD DNS) - using non-recursive queries - and using that data to 
>>>>>>>>>> construct
>>>>>>>>>> answers for its clients.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I hope that helps.
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, Greg
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 at 12:02, Renzo Marengo <
>>>>>>>>>> buckroger2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have Active Directory domain ( 'mydomain.it' ) with 8 domain
>>>>>>>>>>> controllers to manage 8000 computers. Every Domain controller acts 
>>>>>>>>>>> as dns
>>>>>>>>>>> service and resolve internal domain names while forward queries 
>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>> external domains to another server, which Bind9 dns server (It's 
>>>>>>>>>>> inside my
>>>>>>>>>>> company)
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm checking this Bind9 configuration (Centos server) and I see
>>>>>>>>>>> no forward servers so I think It makes bind9 forward queries 
>>>>>>>>>>> directly to
>>>>>>>>>>> root servers. What do you think ?
>>>>>>>>>>> According your opinion this Bind9 server should have to forward
>>>>>>>>>>> requests to one or more dns server by forward option?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
>>>>>>>>>>> unsubscribe from this list
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support
>>>>>>>>>>> subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for
>>>>>>>>>>> more information.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> bind-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> bind-users@lists.isc.org
>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
-- 
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to