On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 03:01:53PM +0200, Erik Stomp wrote: > Hi Maria, > > Honestly, I'm now unaware of what is exactly supported as it's still in > > development but Santiago should know, cc-ing him. > Do you possibly cc-d the wrong person? I'm cc-ing Ondrej, as I think he is > the > right Santiago? :-)
Hi This is me. > If I don't miss anything, the current EVPN implementation does't support > EVPN IRB as described in RFC 9135. > > So my question is: Are there any plans to implement RFC 9135 in the > foreseable future? I know, this isn't a 5 minute task and fully understand > if it's not planned due to low priority. This is not in our current plans for EVPN. I did not evaluate this RFC as it was not necessary for the L2-only use cases that we considered. -- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org) "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."