Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
I think you might be right.I'm not clear why. BitC LET is an _expression_. I think the issue is that the end of the scope that is created by the let ends at the end of the let body, but the location where that scope ends is not syntactically identifiable. I think I am arguing for curly-braces. Curly-braces represent scope (and groups) very naturally, is easy on the eyes for C programmers and is perhaps easier to parse.Once again, though, are you arguing for curly braces specifically, or for *some* unambiguous syntactic delimiter? Hehe. PKE. -- Pål-Kristian Engstad ([email protected]), Lead Graphics & Engine Programmer, Naughty Dog, Inc., 1601 Cloverfield Blvd, 6000 North, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA. Ph.: (310) 633-9112. "Emacs would be a far better OS if it was shipped with a halfway-decent text editor." -- Slashdot, Dec 13. 2005. |
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
