Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Pal-Kristian Engstad > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think I am arguing for curly-braces. Curly-braces represent scope (and >> groups) very naturally, is easy on the eyes for C programmers and is perhaps >> easier to parse. >> > > Parsing (actually, lexing) "{" and "}" is not harder than parsing "in" > and "end". > Sorry, I should have said easier to parse for humans. :-)
PKE -- Pål-Kristian Engstad ([email protected]), Lead Graphics & Engine Programmer, Naughty Dog, Inc., 1601 Cloverfield Blvd, 6000 North, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA. Ph.: (310) 633-9112. "Emacs would be a far better OS if it was shipped with a halfway-decent text editor." -- Slashdot, Dec 13. 2005. _______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
