xor--- via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> writes: > On Thursday, January 21, 2016 11:20:46 AM Rusty Russell via bitcoin-dev wrote: >> So, what should moderation look like from now on? > > The original mail which announced moderation contains this rule: >> - Generally discouraged: [...], +1s, [...] > > I assume "+1s" means statements such as "I agree with doing X". > > Any sane procedure of deciding something includes asking the involved people > whether they're for or against it. > If there are dozens of proposals on how to solve a particular technical > problem, how else do you want to decide it than having a vote?
+1s here means simpling say "+1" or "me too" that carries no additional information. ie. if you like an idea, that's great, but it's not worth interruping the entire list for. If you say "I prefer proposal X over Y because <reasons>" that's different. As is "I dislike X because <reasons>" or "I need X because <reasons>". Hope that clarifies! Rusty. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
