On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 06:33:56AM +0100, xor--- via bitcoin-dev wrote: > So "+1"ing is OK as long as I provide a technical explanation of why I agree? > While I still think that this is too much of a restriction because it > prevents > peer-review, I would say that I could live with it as a last resort if you > don't plan to abolish this rule altogether. > > So in that case, to foster peer review, I would recommend you amend the rules > to clarify this. > Example: "+1s are not allowed unless you provide an explanation of why you > agree with something".
I would extend this to say that the technical explanation also should contribute uniquely to the conversation; a +1 with an explanation the last +1 gave isn't useful. -- 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 000000000000000007e2005be0ce25b3f3de67b2dc35fd810b0ccd77b33eb7be
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
