+1 The distinction we are making importantly requires that contributors provide readers with another thing to say in favor of something - another thing which is different than "X people support this instead of only X-1 people." Evidence trumps votes.
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Gavin via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > On Jan 23, 2016, at 3:59 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev < > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > I would extend this to say that the technical explanation also should > > contribute uniquely to the conversation; a +1 with an explanation > > the last +1 gave isn't useful. > > Yes, comments should contribute to the discussion, with either technical > discussion or additional relevant data. I think a +1 like the following > should be encouraged: > > "+1: we had eleven customer support tickets in just the last week that > would have been prevented if XYZ. > > Jane Doe, CTO CoinBitChainBasely.com" > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > -- I like to provide some work at no charge to prove my value. Do you need a techie? I own Litmocracy <http://www.litmocracy.com> and Meme Racing <http://www.memeracing.net> (in alpha). I'm the webmaster for The Voluntaryist <http://www.voluntaryist.com> which now accepts Bitcoin. I also code for The Dollar Vigilante <http://dollarvigilante.com/>. "He ought to find it more profitable to play by the rules" - Satoshi Nakamoto
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
