On Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at 07:16:49PM +0000, alicexbt wrote: > Hi Peter, > > > Only because the block reward goes away. If it was made to continue > > indefinitely - most likely with an inflation hard fork - demand for block > > space > > would not be critical to Bitcoin's security. > > > I am not completely against your proposal although 100% sure this will not > have "consensus" to be implemented. I think if bitcoin doesn't have enough > demand for block space, it should die. I will be sad if bitcoin doesn't exist > but it should be a lesson for all the people opposing soft forks based on > drama and politics instead of technical review. > > I don't see anything wrong with users paying 100x fees for opening and > closing LN channels.
The PoW security of Bitcoin benefits all Bitcoin users, proportional to the value of BTC they hold; if Bitcoin blocks aren't reliably created the value of *all* BTC goes down. It doesn't make sense for the entire cost of that security to be paid for on a per-tx basis. And there's a high chance paying for it on a per-tx basis won't work anyway due to lack of consistent demand. It would be extremely unfortunate if one of the very few decentralized ways to store value died simply because we couldn't find a way to pay to keep it secure. -- https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
