Dear List, The Ordinals BIP PR has been sitting open for nine months now[0]. I've commented a few times asking the BIP editors to let me know what is needed for the BIP to either be merged or rejected. I've also reached out to the BIP editors via DM and email, but haven't received a response.
There has been much misunderstanding of the nature of the BIP process. BIPS, in particular informational BIPs, are a form of technical documentation, and their acceptance does not indicate that they will be included in any implementation, including Bitcoin Core, nor that they they have consensus among the community. Preexisting BIPs include hard-fork block size increases, hard-fork proof-of-work changes, colored coin voting protocols, rejected soft fork proposals, encouragement of address reuse, and drivechain. I believe ordinals is in-scope for a BIP, and am hoping to get the PR unstuck. I would appreciate feedback from the BIP editors on whether it is in-scope for a BIP, if not, why not, and if so, what changes need to be made for it to be accepted. Best regards, Casey Rodarmor [0] https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1408
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
