On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 05:49:26PM +0000, jlspc wrote: > Hi Peter, > > If feerate-dependent timelocks (FDTs) (1) are supported, it would be possible > to use CTV to define a transaction with a fixed fee and no anchor outputs, as > long as it's racing against a transaction with an FDT.
Fee-rate-dependant timelocks have obvious issues around manipulation of observed fee-rates by miners. It not unreasonable to say they assume miners are honest, which is a significant weakening of the economic incentive-based security model we usually assume in Bitcoin. -- https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
