> This thread is, in my opinion, a waste of time. It's yet again > another perennial bikeshedding proposal brought up many times since at > least 2011, suggesting random changes for > non-existing(/not-yet-existing) issues. > > There is a lot more complexity to the system than the subsidy schedule. >
Well, the main question is what makes Bitcoin secure. It is secured by proofs of work which are produced by miners. Miners have economic incentives to play by the rules; in simple terms, that is more profitable than performing attacks. So the question is, why and when it works? It would be nice to know the boundaries, no?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
