Alex:

I want to add that we know of a large publicly traded organization that uses Asterisk. The contract agreement states not to disclose the technology implementation. The point I'm making here is that large publicly traded organizations do not want the cat out of the bag, even though the cat is out of the bag... so their competition does not have the competitive edge (or at least they hope!).

If you have dealt with large and fortune 500 organizations as we have, you will be surprised the amount of open source apps they use for a variety of reasons. Bank of America - one of the largest financial institutions in the US of A, that makes Bank of Montreal and Royal Bank combined together look like an ant, actively uses Asterisk solutions.

Another publicly traded, fortune 500 organization in the financial sector has converted one of their existing call centre's (in-bound), into a 100 seat call centre & has saved themselves over a million dollars in hardware and licensing.

Large organizations not necessarily want to be backed by large enough vendor to back up the product. The organizations we know of first hand, want "control" - and I mean "full control" of their telecom system and hence have chosen Asterisk, so with a little training their internal I.T. team can control and manage their telecom needs.

You will be surprised the number of organizations already taking advantage of Asterisk !!! They just don't publicly announce it nor beat their drums to expose their technology in place. Forget fortune 500!!! 80% of businesses in Canada comprise of small business owners. They don't have the money to buy Nortel Gear. They sure have the money to buy Asterisk gear! There is enough work out there, for each and every member in the BIZ list, for Asterisk based work. There is enough wealth out there to be made, without having to cannibalize the other consultant.

We've also rescued 3 medium sized organizations from using Nortel BCM & they have been convinced to stay away from signing a contract with Bell.

Large organizations are not stupid. They have many intelligent folks on staff. Large organizations are slowly but surely getting convinced to convert more products to open source. We've seen MORE organizations in the last year and half, embracing Asterisk. Large corporations want to increase "profit". Moving away from proprietary gear and embracing open source alternatives has allowed them to do so.

We know of another start up who started their virtual PBX solution using Asterisk. It would have cost them over $150K to simply get started with proprietary & closed products to allow them to extend their service to their clients.

I rest my case ;).

Cheers!
Reza.


----- Original Message ----- From: "Alex @ Kovasys Inc." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jim Van Meggelen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Toronto Asterisk Business Group" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: [biz] Does open source telephony need an advertising campaign?


Problem is that large institutions do not just need a PBX system, but
they need a unified messaging solution (which Asterisk is far away
from -- in my humble opinion). As well as large company requires this
solution to be backed by large enough vendor who is not going to go
out of business in a few months when something goes wrong because
their business depends on it.

my 2 cents

Alex
VoIPGizmos.ca

Reply via email to