Hiya.
Fine with me. It will of course be virtually impossible to prove one
way or another, but I'm game to wait, and scream blue murder if I feel
my interests aren't being represented. :-)
My other point was the one about risk of fraud, which I think is much
more important anyway.
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 07:16:09PM -0800, William X. Walsh wrote:
>
> > I don't think I missed the point. I wasn't looking at an online payment
> > system as being a single item; it could easily grow into additional
> > "services" provided by OpenSRS. I don't think it's too much of a
> > stretch to assume that once the technology for on-line payments was
> > operational, someone would think it was a good idea to provide it as an
> > additional "service" for the benefit of RSPs.
>
> I think this is a REAL big stretch.
>
> OpenSRS's entire model is dependent on the RSP/customer relationship
> being independent.
>
> What you are saying would be a small leap would actually be a HUGE
> leap for OpenSRS to make, and that leap is no closer by having a
> simple and easy form online that RSPs can fill out and add funds to
> their account easier than the fax method.
>
> What was proposed would not in any way lead to that kind of a change
> in OpenSRS's model. As an RSP that has been with OpenSRS for well
> over a year now, I am positive that I am correct here, and I think any
> of the long term RSPs would say the same.
--
Paul Chvostek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Operations / Development / Abuse / Whatever vox: +1 416 598 0000
IT Canada http://www.it.ca/
