> Maybe the autotools a relatively good idea. However, on projects that use > them, they should never be needed by anyone else but the developers. (Why > does ./configure insist on checking for them? The generation has already > been done, otherwise ./configure wouldn't exist!) > I swear that is a bug in the configure script. The whole point of ./configure is to create a Makefile that will work. If you have played with things like Imake or any of the old UNIX tools (edit this file if you have a x86 running Foo UNIX) you would appreciate autotools.
- Re: bbconf 1.0 is released. <BOOM> xOr
- Re: bbconf 1.0 is released. <BOOM> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
- Re: bbconf 1.0 is released. <BOOM> Jason Kasper
- Re: bbconf 1.0 is released. <BOOM> Bill Beal
- Re: bbconf 1.0 is released. <BOOM> Jason Kasper
- Re: bbconf 1.0 is released. <BOOM> Kyle Donaldson
- Re: bbconf 1.0 is released. <BOOM> Jason Kasper
- Re: bbconf 1.0 is released. <BOOM> Kyle Donaldson
- Re: bbconf 1.0 is released. <BOOM> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
- Re: bbconf 1.0 is released. <BOOM> Kyle Donaldson
- Re: bbconf 1.0 is released. <BOOM> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
- Re: bbconf 1.0 is released. <BOOM> Jason Kasper
- Re: bbconf 1.0 is released. <BOOM> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
- Re: bbconf 1.0 is released. <BOOM> Jason Kasper
- Re: bbconf 1.0 is released. <BOOM> Speedy
- Re: bbconf 1.0 is released. <BOOM> Andy Kopciuch
- Re: bbconf 1.0 is released. <BOOM> Michael Andreen
- Re: bbconf 1.0 is released. <BOOM> Randy
- Re: bbconf 1.0 is released. <BOOM> Jason Kasper
- Re: bbconf 1.0 is released. <BOOM> Jason Kasper
- Re: bbconf 1.0 is released. <BOOM> Marco Fioretti