... On 02/08/02, Derek Cunningham decided to write ... > On Fri, Feb08,02 10:36, Anh Lai wrote: > > > IMO, blackbox, coupled with a couple transparent decorless aterms (75% > > > shading, to differenciate them from the bg) is all the eye-candy I need! > > > > And now i can choose to use Eterm transparency with the patch in cvs. .. > > .tis nice. > > > > OK... I must be stupid or something... but I used to use Eterm and I had NO > problems with transparency. Please enlighten me on the issues that you have. > > I know there was some issues with setting the bg with something other than > Esetroot, but what's wrong with just using Esetroot? >
Eterm could not use transparent mode with bsetbg generated backgrouds: e.g: bsetbg -mod 4 4 -bg rgb:46/46/46 -fg rgb:53/53/53 only aterm could use this. but Eterm would work if you just use bsetbg to point to a jpg. now Eterm transparent mode works for both methods of background production with the patch mentioned earlier inthe mailing list that is now in cvs. > DC > > -- > Derek Cunningham > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "All men by nature desire to know." -- Aristotle. > > Registered Linux User Number 195825 > -- ~ Anh Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 'v' Bachelors of Computer Engineering at UIUC // \\ /( )\ ^`~'^ ... Linux ... ain't it cool?
