Randy McMurchy wrote:

>> I've always wanted to ask for this one.
>>
>> Can't we just stop explaining --whateverdir=/path/to/whatever switches?
>> I mean, it should be obvious that it is setting installation paths for,
>> lets say, docs, executable, whatever.
>
> I agree But if they are already in the book, what is the harm in keeping them?

Just another comment.  If the switches are never explained, then the 
user may not fully understand at first.  After a while though, it gets 
obvious.  I have no problem leaving in what is there but not adding it 
for new packages or packages present that don't already have the 
explanations.

   -- Bruce



-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to