Thomas Pegg wrote these words on 07/24/05 20:58 CST: > On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 18:22 -0500, Tushar Teredesai wrote: > >>Hi: >> >>Is there a reason for regenerating the autotools for sgml-common? The >>included configure file worked for me. If we don't regenerate, then we >>don't need the automake patch. >> >>--Tushar. > > > Does this ring any bells: > http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705
This is funny to me. :-) A guy makes some changes to BLFS, then a bunch of months later asks: Why the hell did we make these changes, they're not needed! -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 21:08:00 up 113 days, 20:41, 2 users, load average: 0.26, 0.18, 0.08 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
