Randy McMurchy wrote: > DJ Lucas wrote these words on 07/29/05 21:55 CST: > > >>I have no preference. I had seen the 6.2 target and unassigned myself >>till after release. I'll update it for 6.1 if it's deemed important >>enough, else comment it out and we'll get it ready for readmission in 6.2. > > > My point is that the current Courier instructions don't work (if any > version other than the year-old version in BLFS is used) and there is > no hint or other material to assist readers. > > Courier is the oldest outstanding bug in BLFS for a package update. > There obviously is no Editor interest in keeping up this package. > It appears to be falling into "obligatory" update mode instead of > "all right, a new version, let's get BLFS updated! And from the looks > of things, nobody even has enough interest to even do the "obligatory" > updates. :-)
OK. I'm going to take it out until there is an interest in it. There have been only seven messages in blfs-support this year. The interest is weak and no one wants to bother with it. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
