Andrew Beverley wrote these words on 02/07/07 12:42 CST: > I'm using 2.6.17.4 but I've had a look at 2.6.16.27 (which is what LFS > 6.2 uses). 2.6.16.27 satisfies the 1.3.6 test, so I would argue using > 1.3.6 would tie in better with the the LFS itself.
Good enough. Again, thanks. So, we could simply fix the test in the 1.3.5 version and drive on, or go with Andy's recommendation to update to 1.3.6. I'm willing to go to 1.3.6, on Andy's recommendation, even for the 6.2.0 release. Andy's comments, IMO, have more than qualified him to recommend this version, and vouch for its stability. Anyone disagree? -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.26] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 12:48:00 up 28 days, 13:02, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.03 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
