On 03/05/2012 03:03 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 02:22:00PM +0100, Armin K. wrote: >> On 03/05/2012 01:47 PM, Andrew Benton wrote: >>> On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:08:02 +0100 >>> "Armin K."<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> packagekit-0.7.1 - Absolutely not necesary - neither lfs nor blfs use >>>> any package management. Also, all applications can be made not to even >>>> require it's libraries. >>> >>> Gnome Packagekit has packagekit as a required dependency. >>> >>> Andy >> >> I wrote line for gnome packagekit too ... I could run gnome >> 3.0/3.2/3.3.90 without packagekit or gnome packagekit installed. Just >> needed to pass --disable-packagekit to some packages like nautilus, >> file-roller and some else. > > I have no love for package management tools, I'm from the > generation that came to LFS to get away from 'rpm hell'. BUT - > Wayne took the view that the gnome app was part of gnome, so I went > with that. > > The gnome packages, or at least those with an LFS-7.0 tag, build. > If we're going to drop packagekit then we need a list of all the > packages that need --disable-packagekit. > > ĸen
gnome 3.3.91 is scheduled to release today. I'll be building new packages tonight or tommorow. I'll post a list of packages which can use packagekit. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
