On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 02:22:00PM +0100, Armin K. wrote: > On 03/05/2012 01:47 PM, Andrew Benton wrote: > > On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:08:02 +0100 > > "Armin K."<[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> packagekit-0.7.1 - Absolutely not necesary - neither lfs nor blfs use > >> any package management. Also, all applications can be made not to even > >> require it's libraries. > > > > Gnome Packagekit has packagekit as a required dependency. > > > > Andy > > I wrote line for gnome packagekit too ... I could run gnome > 3.0/3.2/3.3.90 without packagekit or gnome packagekit installed. Just > needed to pass --disable-packagekit to some packages like nautilus, > file-roller and some else.
I have no love for package management tools, I'm from the generation that came to LFS to get away from 'rpm hell'. BUT - Wayne took the view that the gnome app was part of gnome, so I went with that. The gnome packages, or at least those with an LFS-7.0 tag, build. If we're going to drop packagekit then we need a list of all the packages that need --disable-packagekit. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
