On Mon, 5 Mar 2012 13:56:44 +0000 Ken Moffat <[email protected]> wrote:
> Anything in gnome/add/obsolete is not rendered. It's a retirement > home for old gnome packages. Thanks. So it's Ok to remove Hal then? > Until you physically removed some > things this weekend, my impression was that the xml for old packages > always remained in the book, but the packages were commented in > general.ent and in whichever xml file rendered the chapter or > section. I didn't know that. Subversion has a complete record of all the changes that have happened, no information has been lost. For example, to see the change when I deleted glib: svn di -c 9576 > ~/dump.diff patch -R can then revert the changes (assuming the book hasn't changed and the patch still applies). Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
