On 11/12/2013 07:04 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: >> >> We could use --libexecdir=/usr/lib/dovecot, but that puts the >> libexec files file in /usr/lib/dovecot/dovecot/ or we could follow >> CBLFS and use --libexecdir=/usr/lib/dovecot/exec which puts them into >> /usr/lib/dovecot/exec/dovecot/ : preferences ? Personally, I would >> prefer to just let it use /usr/libexec, but I guess that is probably >> still too much in the redhat/gnu tradition for you guys. >> >> I'll fix it up later if we can agree about where to use, I've also >> got one other recent package that needs tweaking. > > I really don't have a problem with /usr/libexec.
I'd prefer /usr/lib/dovecot/exec for consistency sake and to avoid double dovecot subdirectoy. -- Igor Živković http://www.slashtime.net/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
