Igor Živković wrote: > On 11/12/2013 07:04 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Ken Moffat wrote: >>> >>> We could use --libexecdir=/usr/lib/dovecot, but that puts the >>> libexec files file in /usr/lib/dovecot/dovecot/ or we could follow >>> CBLFS and use --libexecdir=/usr/lib/dovecot/exec which puts them into >>> /usr/lib/dovecot/exec/dovecot/ : preferences ? Personally, I would >>> prefer to just let it use /usr/libexec, but I guess that is probably >>> still too much in the redhat/gnu tradition for you guys. >>> >>> I'll fix it up later if we can agree about where to use, I've also >>> got one other recent package that needs tweaking. >> >> I really don't have a problem with /usr/libexec. > > I'd prefer /usr/lib/dovecot/exec for consistency sake and to avoid > double dovecot subdirectoy.
I think I like that too. It's better than /usr/libexec/dovecot. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
