On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:38:53PM +0200, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
> >On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:40:34 -0500
> >Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'm currently using seamonkey-2.10.1 (vs current 2.25) and I've found
> > my html5 support to be a little lacking.  I've found the site 
> > http://html5test.com/index.html and have a browser score of 337.
> > What types of scores do others get for your browsers?
> > 
> > I did check my konqueror (4.12.2) and it basically doesn't work at
> > all with a score of 103.  I haven't yet built firefox on this system.
> > 
> >    -- Bruce
> 
> I get 286 with Midori-0.5.7 and WebKit-1.10.0.
> 
> But, honestly, I think noone in their right mind would target a maximum
> score of 555 since that score also includes the following things:
> * Geolocation
> * Webcam access
> * Speech recognition (including microphone access)
> * Filesystem access
> * WebRTC
> * DRM support (included for completeness, does not carry points)
> * Javascript capability (taken for granted, also doesn't carry points)
> 
> A browser that supports all the above misfeatures (with the exception
> of DRM) is the very definition of "trojan malware".
> 

 In descending order:

firefox-28.0 448.

arora [ and the site correctly notes: You are using an unknown
browser that imitates Safari 4.0.4 on Mac OS X 10.6.1 ] 299.

 Breakdown for these, in case anybody cares:
                        firefox         arora
Parsing rules           10              10
Elements                21/30           8/30
Forms                   63/110          70/110
Microdata               5               0/5
Location and Orientation 20             0/20
 that's a bit worrying re firefox, but not surprising
Output                  10              5/10
Input                   13/20           0/20
User Interaction        22/25           22/25
Performance             20/25           24/25
Security                28/40           23/40
History and Navigation  10              10
Video                   25/35           25/35
 Note that the tests for video codecs aren't counted in the
results, but my arora supports MPEG-4 and my firefox doesn't
(that might be be because I build firefox early, dunno).  It's also
not necessarily correct - firefox can happily play back a local mp4
file, although the image size is pretty small.
Audio                   27/30           20/30
Peer To Peer            15              0
2D graphics             19/25           0/25
3D graphics             20/25           0/25
Animation               5               0/5
Communication           35              26/35
Web Applications        20              15/20
Storage                 30              10/30
Files                   10              10
Other                   20              9/20

links - tried this for a laugh, it _really_ doesn't work at all
(no javascript).

 Overall, my inclination is to ignore these results completely!  If
and when I see new breakage, perhaps I'll review that decision.

ĸen
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, dieses Mal als Farce
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to