Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:38:53PM +0200, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
>>> On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:40:34 -0500
>>> Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm currently using seamonkey-2.10.1 (vs current 2.25) and I've found
>>> my html5 support to be a little lacking.  I've found the site
>>> http://html5test.com/index.html and have a browser score of 337.
>>> What types of scores do others get for your browsers?
>>>
>>> I did check my konqueror (4.12.2) and it basically doesn't work at
>>> all with a score of 103.  I haven't yet built firefox on this system.
>>>
>>>     -- Bruce
>>
>> I get 286 with Midori-0.5.7 and WebKit-1.10.0.
>>
>> But, honestly, I think noone in their right mind would target a maximum
>> score of 555 since that score also includes the following things:
>> * Geolocation
>> * Webcam access
>> * Speech recognition (including microphone access)
>> * Filesystem access
>> * WebRTC
>> * DRM support (included for completeness, does not carry points)
>> * Javascript capability (taken for granted, also doesn't carry points)
>>
>> A browser that supports all the above misfeatures (with the exception
>> of DRM) is the very definition of "trojan malware".
>>
>
>   In descending order:
>
> firefox-28.0 448.
>
> arora [ and the site correctly notes: You are using an unknown
> browser that imitates Safari 4.0.4 on Mac OS X 10.6.1 ] 299.
>
>   Breakdown for these, in case anybody cares:
>                       firefox         arora
> Parsing rules         10              10
> Elements              21/30           8/30
> Forms                 63/110          70/110
> Microdata             5               0/5
> Location and Orientation 20           0/20
>   that's a bit worrying re firefox, but not surprising
> Output                        10              5/10
> Input                 13/20           0/20
> User Interaction      22/25           22/25
> Performance           20/25           24/25
> Security              28/40           23/40
> History and Navigation        10              10
> Video                 25/35           25/35
>   Note that the tests for video codecs aren't counted in the
> results, but my arora supports MPEG-4 and my firefox doesn't
> (that might be be because I build firefox early, dunno).  It's also
> not necessarily correct - firefox can happily play back a local mp4
> file, although the image size is pretty small.
> Audio                 27/30           20/30
> Peer To Peer          15              0
> 2D graphics           19/25           0/25
> 3D graphics           20/25           0/25
> Animation             5               0/5
> Communication         35              26/35
> Web Applications      20              15/20
> Storage                       30              10/30
> Files                 10              10
> Other                 20              9/20
>
> links - tried this for a laugh, it _really_ doesn't work at all
> (no javascript).
>
>   Overall, my inclination is to ignore these results completely!  If
> and when I see new breakage, perhaps I'll review that decision.

Thanks Ken.  I was given a URL to check out for teaching.  Please see if 
you can use www.TestOut.com/newlabsim

I don't think there's a password for the beta test but I didn't get that 
far.  If it seems to work for you, then I'll go build FF for this platform.

   -- Bruce



-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to