> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 17:08:10 -0500 > From: Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> > To: BLFS Development List <blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org> > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] blfs bootscripts (-dev) > > akhiezer wrote: > > > Btw, what was it decided you to 'get more involved' on the sysd side - > > e.g. demand for teaching courses on the stuff? > > No, it was a combination of things. There were comments in the lists as > well as irc that people wanted systemd. My judgement is that there are > about an equal number of people on both sides of the issue. > > Additionally, most of the mainstream distros have gone to systemd. If > we want to maintain one of our fundamental goals of being an > instructional resource, we really need to address this. >
Yes, I agree about addressing it: but the two streams in b/lfs should still be separable fairly readily; and that has been getting lessened, and unnecessarily; and it raises doubts about why. > I personally don't like the amount of systemd components mutual > interconnections. IMO, that's not really necessary from a design > standpoint. However, I don't have any input into that. > As noted before and elsewhere (& increasingly), as the 'community' gets its hands on sysd, it'll (the former) knock it into (at _least_ better) shape. akh > -- Bruce > > -- > -- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
