Hi all,
On Fri, 27 Mar 2020, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:09:49AM -0500, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
On 3/27/20 9:24 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
Just built cmake 1.17, llvm 10.0? and trying rustc-1.39. Got an error
It seems that using system LLVM is broken with rustc-1.39.
For the *second* step, we need to think abou moving to rustc-1.42.0.
FYI: I built rustc-1.42 without issues about a week ago (with llvm-9.0.1)
as well as just now (with llvm-10.0 and no instruction changes).
librsvg-2.48.0, gimp-2.10.18 and firefox-75.0b10 build and run fine with
that (llvm-10.0, rustc-1.42, ...) for me.
Is there any special reason we would want to upgrade llvm but not rustc?
Both are rather ugly packages with pretty long pretty similar build times,
but recent rustc versions are available way longer than the recent llvm
one. I'd even expect rustc to be easier to upgrade due to fewer stuff to
test!?
Uwe
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
