I'd like to make a suggestion, as regards the names of the BLFS XML files for the SGML/XML/DocBook sections.
I've just come to add some of the DocBook packages to my LFS/BLFS system, and hence my own copy of the Book sources, and got a bit confused as to what related to what. As things stand the relevant BLFS sources files, and the package sources they expect to have unpacked are: sgml-common.xml sgml-common-0.6.3.tgz sgml-common-0.6.3-manpage-1.patch sgml-dtd.xml docbook-4.5.zip docbook.xml docbook-xml-4.5.zip docbook-xsl.xml docbook-xsl-nons-1.79.2.tar.bz2 docbook-xsl-nons-1.79.2-stack_fix-1.patch docbook-xsl-doc-1.79.2.tar.bz2 sgml-dtd-3.xml docbk31.zip docbook5.xml docbook-5.0.zip docbook51.xml docbook-v5.1-os.zip however, sgml-dtd.xml and sgml-dtd-3.xml are actually about installting DocBook SGML DTDs, not generic SGML DTDs, as can be read in the introductory paragraph for each package. Given that multiple SGML and XSL DTDs cam exist on the same system, I feel that is would be more consistent if the BLFS source files were renamed as follows: sgml-common.xml sgml-common-0.6.3.tgz sgml-common-0.6.3-manpage-1.patch docbock-sgml-45.xml docbook-4.5.zip docbook-xml-45.xml docbook-xml-4.5.zip docbook-xsl.xml docbook-xsl-nons-1.79.2.tar.bz2 docbook-xsl-nons-1.79.2-stack_fix-1.patch docbook-xsl-doc-1.79.2.tar.bz2 docbook-sgml-31.xml docbk31.zip docbook-xml-50.xml docbook-5.0.zip docbook-xml-51.xml docbook-v5.1-os.zip but, in suggesting that, I'm unsure as to what that entails for the Book gneration process as a whole, not least the <?dbhtml filename="docbook-xsl.html"?> tags, So, even though I can't present a fully formed "change request", I hope that the underlying idea is seen as a sensible thing to do. Kevin -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page