On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 04:15, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
<blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
>
> > We rarely change these files, but I agree that the naming is confusing.
> > I run into the problem at release time, but have never gotten to fixing
> > it. I'll see if I can do that today.
> >
> > Thanks for bringing it up.
>
> OK, I've updated the problem docbook pages at revision 22981. Please
> check it out.
>
> Primarily there was confusion between sgml, dtd, and xml. I changed the
> titles of the dtd pages and made internal page changes to match.
>
> -- Bruce
Looks like all that happened whileI was I asleep !
Personally, I'd still prefer the full version info, so
pst/xml/docbook50.xml
over
pst/xml/docbook5.xml
so as to match
pst/xml/docbook51.xml
although I see that in the SGML directory, you've also kept the dot
between the major and mnor versions, so
pst/sgml/docbook-4.5-dtd.xml
as opposed to
pst/xml/docbook-45-xml.xml
and I still think that
1) the version number should come last (less of an issue than (2) )
2) as they are all DTDs, you either put the type of DTD
in the name for all, or you don't, and you put the fact
that they're a DTD in the name for all, or you dont.
For me, assuming you want the dot between the major and mnor versions
pst/sgml/
docbook-sgml-3.1.xml
docbook-sgml-4.5.xml
pst/xml/
docbook-xml-4.5.xml
docbook-xml-5.0.xml
docbook-xml-5.1.xml
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
