On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 04:15, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev <blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org> wrote: > > > We rarely change these files, but I agree that the naming is confusing. > > I run into the problem at release time, but have never gotten to fixing > > it. I'll see if I can do that today. > > > > Thanks for bringing it up. > > OK, I've updated the problem docbook pages at revision 22981. Please > check it out. > > Primarily there was confusion between sgml, dtd, and xml. I changed the > titles of the dtd pages and made internal page changes to match. > > -- Bruce
Looks like all that happened whileI was I asleep ! Personally, I'd still prefer the full version info, so pst/xml/docbook50.xml over pst/xml/docbook5.xml so as to match pst/xml/docbook51.xml although I see that in the SGML directory, you've also kept the dot between the major and mnor versions, so pst/sgml/docbook-4.5-dtd.xml as opposed to pst/xml/docbook-45-xml.xml and I still think that 1) the version number should come last (less of an issue than (2) ) 2) as they are all DTDs, you either put the type of DTD in the name for all, or you don't, and you put the fact that they're a DTD in the name for all, or you dont. For me, assuming you want the dot between the major and mnor versions pst/sgml/ docbook-sgml-3.1.xml docbook-sgml-4.5.xml pst/xml/ docbook-xml-4.5.xml docbook-xml-5.0.xml docbook-xml-5.1.xml -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page