On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 07:50:14PM +0000, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 11:33:30AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > > On 1/5/21 9:34 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 02:33:35PM +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev > > > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 18:21 +0000, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > Just checking all packages, the following are present: > >
Replying with the state of play before Pierre had identified that using -i is what can cause gtkdocize to be required (i.e. for packages which mention gtk-doc if I understood correctly) : > > networking/netprogs/cifsutils.xml: autoreconf -fiv I guess my mail to Doug got treated as spam, as will this one. There seems to be a perfectly usable configure script in all versions of cifs-utils that have been in the book since this autoreconf was added - I have not tried to run autoreconf on this. > > > > networking/netlibs/libnsl.xml: autoreconf -fi > > Not yet tested. > > x/lib/clutter.xml: autoreconf -f -i This has been commented out. > > x/lib/cairo.xml: autoreconf -fiv gtkdocize is needed, I can test without -i. > > postlfs/filesystems/reiser.xml: autoreconf -fiv gtkdocize not required. > > postlfs/security/volume_key.xml: autoreconf -fiv gtkdocize not required. > > > > postlfs/security/polkit.xml: autoreconf -fi gtkdocize is needed for this, but up-thread Pierre said we don't need -i. > > postlfs/security/tripwire.xml: autoreconf -fi gtkdocize not required. > > multimedia/libdriv/libmad.xml: autoreconf -fi I seem to have missed this one. Ah, no, it's another one that has been commented out. > > general/graphlib/sassc.xml: autoreconf -fi gtkdocize not needed. For testing with DESTDIR pass --with-libsass= to point to where the lib was installed. > > general/graphlib/libraw.xml: autoreconf -fiv gtkdocize not required. > > general/genlib/telepathy-glib.xml: autoreconf -fiv Needs gtkdocize, I think I have the deps to test without -i. > > general/genlib/libunique.xml: autoreconf -fi Needs gtkdocize, I think I have the deps to test without -i. > > general/genlib/libgrss.xml: autoreconf -fiv Needs gtkdocize, I think I have the deps to test without -i. > > general/genlib/exempi.xml: autoreconf -fiv gtkdocize is not required. > > general/genlib/libpaper.xml: autoreconf -fi gtkdocize is not required. > > > > general/genutils/gtk-doc.xml: autoreconf -fiv gtkdocize is not required. > > pst/sgml/sgml-common.xml: autoreconf -f -i gtkdocize is not required. > > xsoft/other/tigervnc.xml: autoreconf -fiv gtkdocize is not required. > > > > I didn't check the individual pages, but perhaps they all should use -fv. > > We would need to do a test build at least though make to ensure the > > instructions still work. > > > > -- Bruce > > That's what I meant (for "do the current instructions need > gtkdocize" I've already completed), and for some of those (few) that > do, I have the deps and can see if dropping -i solves things. > So, it looks like I still have one to test, one non-book package to test, and a few to retest without -i. ĸen -- Lu-Tze had long considered that everything happens for a reason, except possibly football. -- The Thief Of Time -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
