On 10/5/06, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The file bin/installmesa appears to be missing from the latest version of MesaLib. Does anyone know whether this is just a packaging error on their part or whether there's a different mechanism for installing the package? The release notes didn't mention it. doc/install.html just mentions 'make install'. Having never touched Mesa before, I've no idea why one would want to use 'bin/installmesa' as opposed to 'make install'.
The developer just added the `make install' target a couple months ago. http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=users/krh/mesa.git;a=commit;h=37d6682b5536d170f4ae8dbf947fe31b7632157b You can pass INSTALL_DIR and DRI_DRIVER_INSTALL_DIR if you want to do a DESTDIR style install. See configs/default like Luca said. Whether you want to trust this target or not, I don't know. I never liked bin/installmesa much. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
