On 2/16/10, Agathoklis D. Hatzimanikas <a.hat...@gmail.com> wrote: > But, if both Book maintainers say that there is no need for a BLFS release > anymore, then at > least we have to find a workable scheme, so we can give to the developers > and users a clear > target and don't leave them in the mist.
I claim that BLFS is a wonderful work of art with many thanks to the developers. I suggest that when LFS-6.5 was released, there should at least have been a BLFS-6.5-RC1, and when LFS-6.6 is released there should at least be at a BLFS-6.6-RC1. Anybody would always be welcome to use the development version. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
