Le 27/11/2014 00:51, alex lupu a écrit :
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Pierre Labastie
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> Direct Rendering Manager ---> (Alex, this is the prompt with linux
> 3.1{6,7}, but maybe I missed your point).
>
>
> Hi Pierre,
>
> I think my point was (it was many posts ago :) that to reach Guy's
> Intel I810 line:
>
> ... Direct Rendering Manager ---> Intel I810: Y or M ...
>
> on my 3.17.2 , at the time ... Direct Rendering Manager ---> <M>
> Direct Rendering Manager (XFree86 4.1.0 and higher DRI support)
> ---> <M> Intel I810 ...,
>
> I had to go through the above extra line ( ... XFree86 4.1.0 ...)
>
> Please note:
>
> I do not have an i810 (mine is i915, FWIW); I just wanted to
> simulate an i810 in the config so I can compare my apples to Guy's.
>
> I do understand the point that based on some other setting,
> parameters, etc., the config lines can differ (I favor loadable
> modules). That was my point to _Guy_, that lines can differ based on
> systems and choices.
>
> Thanks for your help, -- Alex
>
Well, I saw that extra line, but did not think of disabling it! You are
right: when it is not ticked, the whole DRM menu disappears.
I believed that ticking was only needed for accessing the submenu
indicated by the ---> (about EDID and other things I do not really
understand).
Will add that to the book. Thanks.
*Question to others*: I am inclined to write this way:
Direct Rendering Manager --->
Direct Rendering Manager (XFree86 4.1.0 and higher DRI support) ---> : Y
Intel I810: Y or M
....
Please note that I propose _not_ to add "or M" to the first line. The
reason is that if you tick only "M" at this point, you cannot tick "Y"
for the prompts below. Thoughts?
Pierre
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
