LGTM1

On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 11:08 PM Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 4:08 AM Adam Rice <ri...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Contact emailsri...@chromium.org, yhir...@chromium.org
>>
>> Explainer
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dTycWmyxLZNGTBW93fvtf1IQahx-vNwgu94yT1x9K50/edit
>>
>> Specificationhttps://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#ref-for-dom-response-json
>>
>> Summary
>>
>> Improves ergonomics for creating JSON Response objects. The Response
>> constructor allows for creating the body of the response from many types,
>> however it is not possible to directly create a JSON object. The
>> Response.json() static method fills this gap. It returns a Response object
>> with a body consisting the first argument serialized as JSON. The second
>> argument is a ResponseInit option bag as with the Response constructor.
>>
>>
>> Blink componentBlink>Network>FetchAPI
>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3ENetwork%3EFetchAPI>
>>
>> Motivation
>>
>> Creating a Response object with a body of a JSON object has been harder
>> than the other types supported by Fetch. This change improves the
>> ergonomics of creating a JSON response.
>>
>>
>> Initial public proposalhttps://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1389
>>
>> TAG reviewhttps://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/741
>>
>
> The TAG review issue says they'd look into this next week. Given the fact
> that the issue was filed a couple of weeks ago, it seems reasonable to wait
> till then.
>
>
>>
>>
>> TAG review statusPending
>>
>> Risks
>>
>>
>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>
>> Interoperability risk is low as Deno and Node have already implemented
>> the feature, and it is a simple addition to the API. We know of no
>> compatibility risk. It could happen if someone is using a polyfill with an
>> incompatible API, but that is unlikely.
>>
>>
>> *Gecko*: Worth prototyping (
>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/640)
>>
>> *WebKit*: Positive (
>> https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2022-May/032254.html)
>>
>> *Web developers*: Positive (https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1389)
>> Example positive feedback:
>> https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1389#issuecomment-1024726318 Example
>> negative feedback:
>> https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1389#issuecomment-1024880489
>>
>
> Great feedback from developers!!
>
>
>>
>>
>> *Other signals*:
>>
>> Ergonomics
>>
>> This is a convenience function that is purely an ergonomic improvement.
>>
>>
>> Activation
>>
>> The feature can be easily polyfilled.
>>
>>
>> Security
>>
>> The feature adds no capabilities that developers don't already have. The
>> implementation mostly reuses existing logic, reducing the security risk.
>>
>>
>> WebView application risks
>>
>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that
>> it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>
>> No
>>
>>
>> Debuggability
>>
>> Automatically supported as a feature implemented in WebIDL.
>>
>>
>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>> ?Yes
>>
>> Flag name
>>
>> Requires code in //chrome?False
>>
>> Tracking bughttps://crbug.com/1305358
>>
>> Non-OSS dependencies
>>
>> Does the feature depend on any code or APIs outside the Chromium open
>> source repository and its open-source dependencies to function?
>> No
>>
>> Estimated milestones
>>
>> No milestones specified
>>
>>
>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5197912798658560
>>
>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAC_ixdx%3DCG59iJ68vnOtRJC5ZCVK%2B4jing0n83HhkX2Kze%3DJiQ%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAC_ixdx%3DCG59iJ68vnOtRJC5ZCVK%2B4jing0n83HhkX2Kze%3DJiQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfVbMSWhXta14OUxXSNxy3eGO0jGxfzuKjT9edHPVpb-FQ%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfVbMSWhXta14OUxXSNxy3eGO0jGxfzuKjT9edHPVpb-FQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOMQ%2Bw-gd1oV%2B3FQVtS2%2B7nrSfTNqPhQ35MQtiORXBSC_zUcOg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to