LGTM2

On Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 5:53:49 PM UTC+2 Chris Harrelson wrote:

> LGTM1
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 11:08 PM Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org> 
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 4:08 AM Adam Rice <ri...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Contact emailsri...@chromium.org, yhir...@chromium.org
>>>
>>> Explainer
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dTycWmyxLZNGTBW93fvtf1IQahx-vNwgu94yT1x9K50/edit
>>>
>>> Specificationhttps://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#ref-for-dom-response-json
>>>
>>> Summary
>>>
>>> Improves ergonomics for creating JSON Response objects. The Response 
>>> constructor allows for creating the body of the response from many types, 
>>> however it is not possible to directly create a JSON object. The 
>>> Response.json() static method fills this gap. It returns a Response object 
>>> with a body consisting the first argument serialized as JSON. The second 
>>> argument is a ResponseInit option bag as with the Response constructor.
>>>
>>>
>>> Blink componentBlink>Network>FetchAPI 
>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3ENetwork%3EFetchAPI>
>>>
>>> Motivation
>>>
>>> Creating a Response object with a body of a JSON object has been harder 
>>> than the other types supported by Fetch. This change improves the 
>>> ergonomics of creating a JSON response.
>>>
>>>
>>> Initial public proposalhttps://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1389
>>>
>>> TAG reviewhttps://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/741
>>>
>>
>> The TAG review issue says they'd look into this next week. Given the fact 
>> that the issue was filed a couple of weeks ago, it seems reasonable to wait 
>> till then.
>>  
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> TAG review statusPending
>>>
>>> Risks
>>>
>>>
>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>
>>> Interoperability risk is low as Deno and Node have already implemented 
>>> the feature, and it is a simple addition to the API. We know of no 
>>> compatibility risk. It could happen if someone is using a polyfill with an 
>>> incompatible API, but that is unlikely.
>>>
>>>
>>> *Gecko*: Worth prototyping (
>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/640)
>>>
>>> *WebKit*: Positive (
>>> https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2022-May/032254.html)
>>>
>>> *Web developers*: Positive (https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1389) 
>>> Example positive feedback: 
>>> https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1389#issuecomment-1024726318 Example 
>>> negative feedback: 
>>> https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1389#issuecomment-1024880489
>>>
>>
>> Great feedback from developers!!
>>  
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Other signals*:
>>>
>>> Ergonomics
>>>
>>> This is a convenience function that is purely an ergonomic improvement.
>>>
>>>
>>> Activation
>>>
>>> The feature can be easily polyfilled.
>>>
>>>
>>> Security
>>>
>>> The feature adds no capabilities that developers don't already have. The 
>>> implementation mostly reuses existing logic, reducing the security risk.
>>>
>>>
>>> WebView application risks
>>>
>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such 
>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>
>>> No
>>>
>>>
>>> Debuggability
>>>
>>> Automatically supported as a feature implemented in WebIDL.
>>>
>>>
>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>> ?Yes
>>>
>>> Flag name
>>>
>>> Requires code in //chrome?False
>>>
>>> Tracking bughttps://crbug.com/1305358
>>>
>>> Non-OSS dependencies
>>>
>>> Does the feature depend on any code or APIs outside the Chromium open 
>>> source repository and its open-source dependencies to function?
>>> No
>>>
>>> Estimated milestones
>>>
>>> No milestones specified
>>>
>>>
>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5197912798658560
>>>
>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAC_ixdx%3DCG59iJ68vnOtRJC5ZCVK%2B4jing0n83HhkX2Kze%3DJiQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAC_ixdx%3DCG59iJ68vnOtRJC5ZCVK%2B4jing0n83HhkX2Kze%3DJiQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfVbMSWhXta14OUxXSNxy3eGO0jGxfzuKjT9edHPVpb-FQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfVbMSWhXta14OUxXSNxy3eGO0jGxfzuKjT9edHPVpb-FQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/d247eeaf-f3be-438f-b1f3-5ab6ee6e4594n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to