Adam, When are you hoping to ship?
Joe Joe Medley | Technical Writer, Chrome DevRel | jmed...@google.com | 816-678-7195 *If an API's not documented it doesn't exist.* On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 8:56 AM Philip Jägenstedt <foo...@chromium.org> wrote: > LGTM3 > > The TAG review has been sitting for a month now, and this proposal has > already received scrutiny in the spec discussion. If there's feedback (on > naming or otherwise) before this reaches stable, we should take it into > account. > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 5:54 PM Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> LGTM2 >> >> On Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 5:53:49 PM UTC+2 Chris Harrelson wrote: >> >>> LGTM1 >>> >>> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 11:08 PM Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 4:08 AM Adam Rice <ri...@chromium.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Contact emailsri...@chromium.org, yhir...@chromium.org >>>>> >>>>> Explainer >>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dTycWmyxLZNGTBW93fvtf1IQahx-vNwgu94yT1x9K50/edit >>>>> >>>>> Specificationhttps://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#ref-for-dom-response-json >>>>> >>>>> Summary >>>>> >>>>> Improves ergonomics for creating JSON Response objects. The Response >>>>> constructor allows for creating the body of the response from many types, >>>>> however it is not possible to directly create a JSON object. The >>>>> Response.json() static method fills this gap. It returns a Response object >>>>> with a body consisting the first argument serialized as JSON. The second >>>>> argument is a ResponseInit option bag as with the Response constructor. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Blink componentBlink>Network>FetchAPI >>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3ENetwork%3EFetchAPI> >>>>> >>>>> Motivation >>>>> >>>>> Creating a Response object with a body of a JSON object has been >>>>> harder than the other types supported by Fetch. This change improves the >>>>> ergonomics of creating a JSON response. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Initial public proposalhttps://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1389 >>>>> >>>>> TAG reviewhttps://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/741 >>>>> >>>> >>>> The TAG review issue says they'd look into this next week. Given the >>>> fact that the issue was filed a couple of weeks ago, it seems reasonable to >>>> wait till then. >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> TAG review statusPending >>>>> >>>>> Risks >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility >>>>> >>>>> Interoperability risk is low as Deno and Node have already implemented >>>>> the feature, and it is a simple addition to the API. We know of no >>>>> compatibility risk. It could happen if someone is using a polyfill with an >>>>> incompatible API, but that is unlikely. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Gecko*: Worth prototyping ( >>>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/640) >>>>> >>>>> *WebKit*: Positive ( >>>>> https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2022-May/032254.html) >>>>> >>>>> *Web developers*: Positive ( >>>>> https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1389) Example positive >>>>> feedback: >>>>> https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1389#issuecomment-1024726318 >>>>> Example >>>>> negative feedback: >>>>> https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1389#issuecomment-1024880489 >>>>> >>>> >>>> Great feedback from developers!! >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Other signals*: >>>>> >>>>> Ergonomics >>>>> >>>>> This is a convenience function that is purely an ergonomic improvement. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Activation >>>>> >>>>> The feature can be easily polyfilled. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Security >>>>> >>>>> The feature adds no capabilities that developers don't already have. >>>>> The implementation mostly reuses existing logic, reducing the security >>>>> risk. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> WebView application risks >>>>> >>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such >>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? >>>>> >>>>> No >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Debuggability >>>>> >>>>> Automatically supported as a feature implemented in WebIDL. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests >>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md> >>>>> ?Yes >>>>> >>>>> Flag name >>>>> >>>>> Requires code in //chrome?False >>>>> >>>>> Tracking bughttps://crbug.com/1305358 >>>>> >>>>> Non-OSS dependencies >>>>> >>>>> Does the feature depend on any code or APIs outside the Chromium open >>>>> source repository and its open-source dependencies to function? >>>>> No >>>>> >>>>> Estimated milestones >>>>> >>>>> No milestones specified >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status >>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5197912798658560 >>>>> >>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status >>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. >>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAC_ixdx%3DCG59iJ68vnOtRJC5ZCVK%2B4jing0n83HhkX2Kze%3DJiQ%40mail.gmail.com >>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAC_ixdx%3DCG59iJ68vnOtRJC5ZCVK%2B4jing0n83HhkX2Kze%3DJiQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>> . >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "blink-dev" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. >>>> >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfVbMSWhXta14OUxXSNxy3eGO0jGxfzuKjT9edHPVpb-FQ%40mail.gmail.com >>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfVbMSWhXta14OUxXSNxy3eGO0jGxfzuKjT9edHPVpb-FQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>> . >>>> >>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "blink-dev" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/d247eeaf-f3be-438f-b1f3-5ab6ee6e4594n%40chromium.org >> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/d247eeaf-f3be-438f-b1f3-5ab6ee6e4594n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "blink-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAARdPYejeFEVPSPzSEexrEAdYKjWg8q9aNDU6vVGLmrSF42tpw%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAARdPYejeFEVPSPzSEexrEAdYKjWg8q9aNDU6vVGLmrSF42tpw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAJUhtG_WtLiPu2zcoMc4fpzCkCKTvOCuR0ZSyo-OzC1WtxgVBg%40mail.gmail.com.
