Apparently my earlier response got stuck in moderation but for the record 
this was exactly what I was looking for Anton. Thank you!

Hans


On Saturday, March 9, 2024 at 5:12:34 PM UTC-7 Anton Bershanskyi wrote:

> Hi Hans,
>
> > bit of detail about the work currently being done to extract WebSQL.
>
> You might be interested in this bug 
> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues/40910849> titled "Delete WebSQL data 
> after API removal". Also, data deletion will occur only after the actual 
> API code is deleted, which will take some time. For reference, I looked 
> into what it would take and came up with this ~18K LOC patch 
> <https://github.com/chromium/chromium/compare/main...bershanskiy:chromium:flag-web-sql-access>
>  (and 
> I'm not done writing tests for it yet!).
>
> Sincerely,
> Anton.
> On Saturday, March 9, 2024 at 4:29:36 PM UTC+2 Hans Meyer wrote:
>
>> >  I'm not aware of such polyfil, however I'm not sure why you would need 
>> one
>>
>> Ah ok. I misunderstood. This is actually the biggest part of the lift and 
>> risk in my particular case. There's a ton of nested 
>> db.transaction()/tx.executeSql() calls that would need to be rewritten and 
>> the app in some cases relies directly on SQLResultSet. It's messy.
>>
>> > the user will need to start up browser and load every profile with your 
>> extension after you publish the extension update but before Chrome 124
>>
>> This is my main concern. I understand some of this is inevitable. Just 
>> trying to think of ways to mitigate data loss given current circumstances.
>>
>> > There are no guarantees about on-disk files
>>
>> Understood. Just wondering if there were any engineers or 
>> engineer-adjacent folks in the thread who were privy to that bit of detail 
>> about the work currently being done to extract WebSQL.
>>
>> For now I'm gonna focus on wrapping up the release and hope for a speedy 
>> CWS approval.
>>
>> Thanks again Anton.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Hans
>>
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, March 9, 2024 at 4:51:41 AM UTC-7 Anton Bershanskyi wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Hans,
>>>
>>> > Am I correct in understanding that there's a polyfil that allows the 
>>> use of the WebSQL API surface with the WASM-based SQLite port?
>>>
>>> I'm not aware of such polyfil, however I'm not sure why you would need 
>>> one, considering the similarity of the WebSQL API and WASM port: both are 
>>> merely wrappers for SQLite 3, so you would just need to change the 
>>> initialization code to talk to WASM wrapper instead of 
>>> window.openDatabase().
>>>
>>> > I'm a little confused about the necessity for and distinction between 
>>> the two separate releases. ... I will have the new release ready to submit 
>>> to CWS by this Tuesday
>>>
>>> I just proposed this as a way to speed up migration, but since you 
>>> already have a WebSQL-free version ready already, you probably can just 
>>> release that.
>>>
>>> > Does anyone know if the WebSQL db file itself will remain intact?
>>>
>>> There are no guarantees about on-disk files since they are not meant to 
>>> be read or edited manually... But based on past experience, there is 
>>> usually no rush to clean up old code, so the files might stay there for 
>>> some time. Again, no guarantees. You can recover this files like so:
>>>
>>>    1. Go to chrome://profile-internals , find the relevant profile and 
>>>    copy its "Profile Path"
>>>    2. Go to that folder and navigate to 
>>>    ./databases/chrome-extension_<your_extension_id>_<number>
>>>    3. There will be a file which you can open in any SQLite viewer
>>>
>>> Also, note the following: in order for user to migrate data, the user 
>>> will need to start up browser and load every profile with your extension 
>>> after you publish the extension update but before Chrome 124 is installed. 
>>> In fact, it is a known issue that when Chrome changes profile data format 
>>> and deprecates migration code, some profiles do not get migrated because 
>>> they are used so rarely.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Anton.
>>> On Saturday, March 9, 2024 at 7:40:02 AM UTC+2 Hans Meyer wrote:
>>>
>>>> Does anyone know if the WebSQL db file itself will remain intact?
>>>>
>>>> I'm hoping yes, as that would preserve some manual options for recovery.
>>>>
>>>> Hans
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, March 7, 2024 at 2:54:53 PM UTC-7 Anton Bershanskyi wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Hans,
>>>>>
>>>>> It's unfortunate that you find yourself in this situation. I'm not a 
>>>>> Google or Chromium representative, but official representatives answered 
>>>>> this exact question before and consistently rejected 
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/fWYb6evVA-w/m/0YblyNG7AQAJ>
>>>>>  
>>>>> any further deadline changes. However, you can use SQL in the browser via 
>>>>> a 
>>>>> polyfil library (WASM-based SQLite port 
>>>>> <https://developer.chrome.com/blog/sqlite-wasm-in-the-browser-backed-by-the-origin-private-file-system>).
>>>>>  
>>>>> One can relatively trivially export data from WebSQL into a different 
>>>>> browser store (e.g., OPFS) and then continue using existing WebSQL code 
>>>>> via 
>>>>> the polyfil. If you need help, I can show you how to prepare two 
>>>>> incremental extension releases which do this: (1) small revision (with 
>>>>> short review time) which will back up existing data from WebSQL into 
>>>>> other 
>>>>> datastore while still using WebSQL for all work and (2) larger revision 
>>>>> which will use the new datastore and SQLite polyfil with existing WebSQL 
>>>>> call sites. After this, you won't have any time pressure and will be able 
>>>>> to work on refactoring code like converting WebSQL schema to a web-native 
>>>>> storage of your choice.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>> Anton.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday, March 7, 2024 at 10:43:39 PM UTC+2 Hans Meyer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the explanation Panos. That makes sense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OK so... please forgive me folks. I know this is a crazy thing to 
>>>>>> ask, I really do, but I need to take the shot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there ANY possibility whatsoever that access to the API can be 
>>>>>> preserved through 124?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've been grinding away for a year on a major extension rewrite that 
>>>>>> I'll be ready to submit to the Web Store early next week. The upgrade 
>>>>>> path 
>>>>>> includes auto migration from Web SQL to IndexedDB. This extension has 1 
>>>>>> million users and I'm kind of freaking out about the number of them who 
>>>>>> will miss the upgrade window and lose their data.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I know it's a long shot and this is an 11th hour ask and I'm not 
>>>>>> special by any means and I could've been more diligent about heeding the 
>>>>>> deadline... all true... but, well... as embarrassing as it might be, I 
>>>>>> have 
>>>>>> to ask.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Respectfully,
>>>>>> Hans
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tuesday, March 5, 2024 at 11:30:11 AM UTC-7 Panos Astithas wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The difference between the last trial milestone and the end date is 
>>>>>>> due to the fact that origin trial tokens contain the expiration date by 
>>>>>>> design. Given that the token needs to expire after the ending milestone 
>>>>>>> has 
>>>>>>> passed and given the often lengthy browser update cycle for some users, 
>>>>>>> we 
>>>>>>> ended up with a compromise that expects most clients will have been 
>>>>>>> updated 
>>>>>>> when the second to next milestone after the ending one has been 
>>>>>>> released 
>>>>>>> (4+4 weeks later). It is really aiming at avoiding the origin trial 
>>>>>>> feature 
>>>>>>> being prematurely unavailable to users.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Granted this is not very obvious, but it has worked reasonably well 
>>>>>>> in practice.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Panos
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 11:35 AM Hans Meyer <ma...@hansmeyer.com> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fair enough Anton. Admittedly a bit of wishful thinking on my part.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Although FWIW, the origin trial status in dev tools only mentions 
>>>>>>>> the expiration date, not version. By no means an excuse, but I'm 
>>>>>>>> curious, 
>>>>>>>> why express the trial expiration in terms of a date at all, much less 
>>>>>>>> a 
>>>>>>>> date that is 1.5 months after from when it effectively ends for most 
>>>>>>>> users?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Again, no excuses. I agree the versioning was clearly communicated. 
>>>>>>>> Just wanted to give some feedback to consider to possibly minimize 
>>>>>>>> confusion in the future.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for your response,
>>>>>>>> Hans
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sunday, March 3, 2024 at 10:50:43 AM UTC-7 Anton Bershanskyi 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Hans,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Could you please clarify which web page suggests that the WebSQL 
>>>>>>>>> availability would extend to Chrome 124 inclusive? All news/articles 
>>>>>>>>> I 
>>>>>>>>> could find online suggest that the last version supporting WebSQL 
>>>>>>>>> would be 
>>>>>>>>> 123:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    - Feature: Deprecate and Remove WebSQL 
>>>>>>>>>    <https://chromestatus.com/feature/5134293578285056>
>>>>>>>>>    - Web SQL deprecation timeline updated 
>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>> <https://developer.chrome.com/blog/web-sql-deprecation-timeline-updated>
>>>>>>>>>  (the 
>>>>>>>>>    date for Chromium 123 is odd in this one)
>>>>>>>>>    - Deprecating and removing Web SQL 
>>>>>>>>>    <https://developer.chrome.com/blog/deprecating-web-sql>
>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>> Also, the DevTools UI already removed WebSQL viewer from 
>>>>>>>>> "Application" tab. 
>>>>>>>>> <https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/devtools/devtools-frontend/+/5335172>
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>> The change will arrive in Chrome Canary next week. WebSQL flag is 
>>>>>>>>> also 
>>>>>>>>> considered to be expired 
>>>>>>>>> <https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/325834723> (no longer 
>>>>>>>>> available and will be removed from source code soon).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>>>>> Anton.
>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, March 3, 2024 at 5:21:18 PM UTC+2 Hans Meyer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ayu,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Can you clarify... are you saying the deprecation trial does NOT 
>>>>>>>>>> extend to Chrome 124? I would not have expected that given that the 
>>>>>>>>>> trial's 
>>>>>>>>>> expiration date has been communicated consistently as *May 28, 
>>>>>>>>>> 2024*.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Hans
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, February 23, 2024 at 11:15:46 AM UTC-7 Ayu Ishii wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Antonio,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That is correct, 123 will be the last supported version via flag 
>>>>>>>>>>> or policy.
>>>>>>>>>>> 124 will be the first version WebSQL will no longer be available 
>>>>>>>>>>> even with a flag or policy.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>> Ayu
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, February 23, 2024 at 8:02:48 AM UTC-8 Antonio MORENO 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Related to this topic, a bit of a simple question: In the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> initial announcement, it seemed to indicate that Chrome 123 would 
>>>>>>>>>>>> be the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> first version without any kind of support for WebSQL. However, at 
>>>>>>>>>>>> least in 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the current version of the beta (123.0.6312.4) support is still 
>>>>>>>>>>>> there, and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> can be enabled with the corresponding flag. Can you confirm if 
>>>>>>>>>>>> this will be 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the case with the stable version of 123, and the feature will be 
>>>>>>>>>>>> removed 
>>>>>>>>>>>> only in version 124?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, and regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Antonio.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 11:24:34 AM UTC+1 Etienne Noël 
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have been communicating this deprecation for a while now so 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> unfortunately, we will not extend it further.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It’s a significant source of security issues so we will keep 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the original deprecation timeline.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If that can be useful to your situation, SQLite is available 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the browser: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://developer.chrome.com/blog/sqlite-wasm-in-the-browser-backed-by-the-origin-private-file-system
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It might make the migration easier for you if that’s a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> suitable solution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Etienne
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Etienne Noël
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Engineering Manager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chrome Storage
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 16:56 Bobby Langley <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> rlan...@grubbrr.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just started using the origin trial in one of our apps that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> requires a slightly overly extertive lift to change from webSQL 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IndexedDB. The expiry says May 28, 2024 -- what is the potential 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that date 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could be extended while we work to release our new version?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 4:24:25 PM UTC-4 Panos 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Astithas wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guillem,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The page load limit only applies to trials that introduce 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new features, not deprecation trials like this one that remove 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a feature. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apologies for the confusion. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Panos
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 10:29 AM 'Guillem Olivé' via 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blink-dev <blin...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am working by a third-party enterprise and we are still 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using webSQL functionality. Our application will be refactored 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to remove 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, but it will take some time to make it possible.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are apprehensive about the disclaimer in the WebSQL 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Deprecation Trial registration: "I understand that I may need 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to limit use 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of this experimental feature to some subset of my users 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because of the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limit whereby an experimental feature will be disabled if it 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is used on 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more than 0.5% of Chrome page loads (as a median over a 14 day 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> period).". 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will our production application not be able to work if the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> overall usage 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> increases from 0.34% to 0.51% of page loads?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El dia dijous, 13 de juliol de 2023 a les 1:59:41 UTC+2, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ayu Ishii va escriure:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WebSQL Deprecation Trial registration is now available at 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://developer.chrome.com/origintrials/#/view_trial/494270059103911937
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, June 30, 2023 at 6:48:09 AM UTC-7 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tste...@google.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timeline updated in developer-facing comms: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/GoogleChrome/developer.chrome.com/pull/6725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> . 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:57 PM Ayu Ishii <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ay...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi blink owners,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With request from partners, we are planning to update 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the timeline to enable deprecation trial from M117 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (previously M118) to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> provide a larger window to integrate with the trial before 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full removal in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> M119.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The rest of the timeline will stay the same.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NEW - Target timeline:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> M101 - 123 - Enterprise Policy 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://chromeenterprise.google/policies/#WebSQLAccess>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> M115 - Add deprecation message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> M117-123  - Deprecation trial
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> M119 - Ship removal OLD - Target timeline: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> M101 - 123 - Enterprise Policy 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://chromeenterprise.google/policies/#WebSQLAccess>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> M115 - Add deprecation message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> M118-123  - Deprecation trial
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> M119 - Ship removal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Ayu
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 1:36:24 AM UTC-7 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tste...@google.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 10:29 AM Asier Lostalé <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> asier....@openbravo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your reply.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If possible, I'd like to clarify a couple of topics:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - I see there is already an "Allows access to WebSQL 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> APIs" flag that can be used to force access to WebSQL. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For how long is this 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag planned to be kept? Will it be available from M119 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to M123? What about 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after M123?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since the code is going to be removed, the flag will be 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed as a consequence as well. Given the current 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timeline 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://developer.chrome.com/blog/web-sql-deprecation-timeline-updated/>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  I 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would *not* count for the code to exist after 123. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - As a site owner, how can I take part of the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deprecation trial?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please see this article on origin trials 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://developer.chrome.com/docs/web-platform/origin-trials/#deprecation-trials>.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A deprecation trial works just the other way round: rather 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than granting 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your site early access to a future feature, it grants you 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late access to a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> past feature.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thomas Steiner, PhD—Developer Relations Engineer (
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://blog.tomayac.com, https://twitter.com/tomayac)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Germany GmbH, ABC-Str. 19, 20354 Hamburg, Germany 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/ABC-Str.+19,+20354+Hamburg,+Germany?entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Liana Sebastian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----- BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE -----
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Version: GnuPG v2.3.4 (GNU/Linux)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iFy0uwAntT0bE3xtRa5AfeCheCkthAtTh3reSabiGbl0ck0fjumBl3DCharaCTersAttH3b0ttom.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hTtPs://xKcd.cOm/1181/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----- END PGP SIGNATURE -----
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/27f5849e-4762-484d-8afc-80e31692b2f7n%40chromium.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/27f5849e-4762-484d-8afc-80e31692b2f7n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/0e18aeea-aff4-454e-960e-d350edd0d2b7n%40chromium.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/0e18aeea-aff4-454e-960e-d350edd0d2b7n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/84e22042-2bb0-44bb-aafc-658895ebac83n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to