Looking 
at 
https://github.com/WICG/nav-speculation/blob/main/triggers.md#window-name-targeting-hints,
 
what should developers do if they have multiple different targets?
e.g. URL A navigates to "_blank" and URL B navigates "_self"?

On Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 2:43:26 PM UTC+2 Eric Beach wrote:

> I work on Google Meet. For a feature that my subteam is working on which 
> aims to greatly improve user performance and latency, this functionality is 
> critical.
>
> On Tuesday, May 20, 2025 at 7:19:53 AM UTC-4 Chromestatus wrote:
>
>> Contact emails robe...@chromium.org 
>>
>
>> Explainer 
>> https://github.com/WICG/nav-speculation/blob/main/triggers.md#window-name-targeting-hints
>>  
>>
>> Specification 
>> https://wicg.github.io/nav-speculation/speculation-rules.html 
>>
>> Summary 
>>
>> This extends speculation rules syntax to allow developers to specify the 
>> target_hint field. This field provides a hint to indicate a target 
>> navigable where a prerendered page will eventually be activated. For 
>> example, when _blank is specified as a hint, a prerendered page can be 
>> activated for a navigable opened by window.open(). The field has no effect 
>> on prefetching. The specification allows this field to accept any strings 
>> that are valid as navigable target name or keyword as the value, but this 
>> launch supports only one of "_self" or "_blank" strings. If the hint is not 
>> specified, it's treated like "_self" is specified.
>>
>>
>> Blink component Internals>Preload>Prerender 
>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Internals%3EPreload%3EPrerender%22>
>>  
>>
>> Search tags speculationrules <http:///features#tags:speculationrules>, 
>> prerendering <http:///features#tags:prerendering> 
>>
>> TAG review https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/931 
>>
>> TAG review status Issues addressed 
>>
>> Origin Trial Name SpeculationRulesTargetHint 
>>
>> Chromium Trial Name SpeculationRulesTargetHint 
>>
>> Origin Trial documentation link 
>> https://github.com/WICG/nav-speculation/blob/main/triggers.md#window-name-targeting-hints
>>  
>>
>> WebFeature UseCounter name kSpeculationRulesTargetHintBlank 
>>
>> Risks 
>>
>>
>> Interoperability and Compatibility 
>>
>> This feature is a small addition to the existing speculation rules 
>> feature. Speculation rules itself is a progressive enhancement, so the 
>> interoperability risks are low. Additionally, the compatibility risks for 
>> this feature are low: if we removed it in the future, it would cause some 
>> prerenders to start failing, but prerendering is never guaranteed to work 
>> and is hard to depend on.
>>
>>
>> *Gecko*: Neutral (
>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/620) Mozilla was 
>> notified about this addition to the speculation rules syntax on the overall 
>> speculation rules standards positions thread, and gave an overall neutral 
>> response to the feature. 
>>
>> *WebKit*: No signal (
>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/54) 
>>
>> *Web developers*: No signals 
>>
>> *Other signals*: SpeedKit/Baqend 
>> https://github.com/WICG/nav-speculation/issues/374 We also know of a 
>> Google site which has experimented with this feature and successfully used 
>> it to enable prerendering which was previously not possible 
>>
>> WebView application risks 
>>
>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that 
>> it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>
>> None
>>
>>
>> Debuggability 
>>
>> DevTools supports speculation rules: 
>> https://developer.chrome.com/blog/debugging-speculation-rules/
>>
>>
>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, 
>> Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)? No 
>>
>> Android WebView doesn't support speculation rules prerender yet.
>>
>>
>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>> ? Yes 
>>
>> https://wpt.fyi/results/speculation-rules/prerender
>>
>>
>> Flag name on about://flags 
>> enable-speculation-rules-prerendering-target-hint 
>>
>> Finch feature name Prerender2InNewTab 
>>
>> Rollout plan Will ship enabled for all users 
>>
>> Requires code in //chrome? False 
>>
>> Tracking bug https://issues.chromium.org/issues/40234240 
>>
>> Availability expectation Feature is available on Web Platform in M138. 
>>
>> Sample links 
>> https://prerender2-specrules.glitch.me 
>>
>> Estimated milestones 
>> Shipping on desktop 138 
>> Origin trial desktop first 135 
>> Origin trial desktop last 138 
>> Shipping on Android 138 
>> Origin trial Android first 135 
>> Origin trial Android last 138 
>>
>> Anticipated spec changes 
>>
>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or 
>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues 
>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may 
>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of 
>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>> No spec changes are planned. 
>>
>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status 
>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5162540351094784?gate=5144913335549952 
>>
>> Links to previous Intent discussions Intent to Experiment: 
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/67c935cc.2b0a0220.325104.02b6.GAE%40google.com
>>  
>>
>>
>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
>> <https://chromestatus.com>. 
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/e49f6e57-52a8-41b8-a0fd-892ba227394fn%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to