Sorry, that got redirected. A typical API is at:
https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/public-api/v1/categories
I have lost the page it was referenced from.


On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 10:03 PM Peter Murray-Rust <pm...@cam.ac.uk> wrote:

> After a great deal of time browsing the site/s (it seems a mishmash
> between ACS and this new "Cambridge Engage" and is difficult to navigate) I
> found:
> https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/public-api/v1/categories
> and other parts of the API.
>
> I have not yet tried downloading anything yet.
>
> P.
>
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 4:36 PM Rzepa, Henry S <h.rz...@imperial.ac.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> Taken over by new “management” recently I believe.  Not much explicit
>> data either.
>>
>> Henry Rzepa
>>
>> On 23 Jul 2021, at 16:07, Peter Murray-Rust <pm...@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>> 
>> Thanks Alain for the sanity check.
>> The site is very unclear, and somewhat depressing. There is almost no
>> information about chemistry anywhere.
>>
>> Despite the web site saying there is an API I can't find any docs. And I
>> worry that there is a "sign in" button which allows the providers to
>> monitor activity. Maybe it's only for submissions - we'll see.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 3:23 PM Alain Borel <alain.bo...@epfl.ch> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> 2) for the more recent evolution: https://connect.acspubs.org/chemrxiv
>>> (thanks for pointing out the managerial change, by the way... I might have
>>> missed it!)
>>>
>> It's still unclear who is running the docs. Many of the pointers go to
>> the ACS.
>>
>>> 3) for almost everything else:
>>> https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/submission-information ; an API is
>>> mentioned, but without an endpoint it isn't very useful. The CUP
>>> announcement says that an API will become (future tense) available in the
>>> near future. The announcement is 6 days old, I assume it will take a couple
>>> of weeks at least.
>>>
>> Well I might send an email.
>>
>>> I assume the content will be mostly PDF, sometimes better (with
>>> structured data for X-ray structures or spectra, for example), sometimes
>>> worse (according to the FAQ Powerpoint presentation are accepted...
>>> shudder).
>>>
>> Oh...
>> ...Dear
>>
>> P.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> "I always retain copyright in my papers, and nothing in any contract I
>> sign with any publisher will override that fact. You should do the same".
>>
>> Peter Murray-Rust
>> Reader Emeritus in Molecular Informatics
>> Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry
>> University of Cambridge
>> CB2 1EW, UK
>> +44-1223-336432
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blueobelisk-discuss mailing list
>> Blueobelisk-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/blueobelisk-discuss
>>
>>
>
> --
> "I always retain copyright in my papers, and nothing in any contract I
> sign with any publisher will override that fact. You should do the same".
>
> Peter Murray-Rust
> Reader Emeritus in Molecular Informatics
> Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry
> University of Cambridge
> CB2 1EW, UK
> +44-1223-336432
>


-- 
"I always retain copyright in my papers, and nothing in any contract I sign
with any publisher will override that fact. You should do the same".

Peter Murray-Rust
Reader Emeritus in Molecular Informatics
Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry
University of Cambridge
CB2 1EW, UK
+44-1223-336432
_______________________________________________
Blueobelisk-discuss mailing list
Blueobelisk-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/blueobelisk-discuss

Reply via email to