Brilliant :)) A good answer to cover all the concerns raised. A small team with input from different mailing-list groups. General discussion about that website and all the 'local' ones can be kept to the website mailing-list with any luck.
Perhaps an occasional report to SC would be "the icing on the cake" but given that 'some' steering group members are on the website list and some website team are on the SC i think this would be best done informally. Regards from Tom :) ________________________________ From: Stefan Weigel <stefan.wei...@bildungskreis.org> To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org Sent: Fri, 14 January, 2011 20:34:19 Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] Minutes of SC call 2011-01-13 for review Hi SC, Am 14.01.2011 16:20, schrieb Andre Schnabel: >http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/TDF/Steering_Committee_Meetings#Minutes_2011-01-13 >3 <quote> # decision: SC appoints a team of 4 people that will be responsible for managing the website for a trial period of two months this team consists of: * David Nelson (for textual content) * Christoph Noack (for user experience) * Ivan Miskovic (for design) * Christian Lohmaier (for infrastructure) </qoute> Is this for the international ("main") site only? Are we still allowed to use our roles as authors and publishers in Silverstripe, as we have done the past weeks? Stefan -- LibreOffice - Die Freiheit nehm' ich mir! -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
